Skip to content

version 1.1.0 takes antiSMASH5 result? #17

Closed Answered by jorgecnavarrom
ghost asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Yes, we didn't remove the types from previous versions of antiSMASH, so it should work ok with 5.1 input

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by jorgecnavarrom
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
1 participant
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #10 on August 15, 2022 09:29.