Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is it feasible to implement somehow LAPACK routines which are lacking in older Accelerate? #18

Open
barracuda156 opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Is it feasible to implement somehow LAPACK routines which are lacking in older Accelerate? #18

barracuda156 opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@barracuda156
Copy link

Time to time we get broken linking when some ports, apparently, assume everything should be present without checking for availability of symbols.

Likely examples at hand:
icl-utk-edu/lapackpp#25
liuyangzhuan/ButterflyPACK#18
(And I have encountered similar cases elsewhere.)

A case where some of missing routines were re-implemented: pghysels/STRUMPACK@0eb1477

Is it possible to have some general solution? Or am I asking in a wrong place? :)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@barracuda156