Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Calculate Missing Fields to Punish Miner Utility Score #123

Open
Tracked by #33
grantdfoster opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Tracked by #33

Calculate Missing Fields to Punish Miner Utility Score #123

grantdfoster opened this issue Jun 27, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
blocked enhancement New feature or request triage

Comments

@grantdfoster
Copy link
Contributor

grantdfoster commented Jun 27, 2024

Follow up task for #11

Valid Fields (vF, w1): Miners should be punished for missing fields, not necessarily rewarded for having correct ones. Score can be decremented by a certain value for every missing field. Possible expansion into utilizing client version, and punishing those nodes running stale versions of the protocol (future case). Example weight: 0.3

@grantdfoster grantdfoster added the feature New feature or task label Jun 27, 2024
@grantdfoster grantdfoster added task and removed feature New feature or task labels Jun 27, 2024
@grantdfoster grantdfoster changed the title Validate miner response data via validator at random intervals Punish Miner Score for Missing Fields Jul 2, 2024
@grantdfoster grantdfoster changed the title Punish Miner Score for Missing Fields Calculate Missing Fields to Punish Miner Utility Score Jul 2, 2024
@mudler mudler added the triage label Jul 15, 2024
@grantdfoster
Copy link
Contributor Author

Update

Putting this on pause as we wait for the outcome of https://github.com/masa-finance/issues/issues/197, which likely implements a better mechanism for scoring valid data.

@mudler mudler added enhancement New feature or request and removed task labels Jul 17, 2024
@grantdfoster grantdfoster removed their assignment Jul 17, 2024
@juanmanso
Copy link
Contributor

I think this is a smaller task of masa-finance/issues#197, so I'd suggest to close it.

To show this even more, I'd move this to Ready since it's paused and add a blocked label to show the dependency. On grooming/planning we can decide if we can close it or not (adding also the triage label)

@giovaroma
Copy link

Locking down version to participate. Ticket to be updated by @grantdfoster @hide-on-bush-x

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blocked enhancement New feature or request triage
Projects
None yet
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

6 participants