You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
idna 0.5.0 and earlier accepts Punycode labels that do not produce any non-ASCII output, which means that either ASCII labels or the empty root label can be masked such that they appear unequal without IDNA processing or when processed with a different implementation and equal when processed with idna 0.5.0 or earlier.
Concretely, example.org and xn--example-.org become equal after processing by idna 0.5.0 or earlier. Also, example.org.xn-- and example.org. become equal after processing by idna 0.5.0 or earlier.
In applications using idna (but not in idna itself) this may be able to lead to privilege escalation when host name comparison is part of a privilege check and the behavior is combined with a client that resolves domains with such labels instead of treating them as errors that preclude DNS resolution / URL fetching and with the attacker managing to introduce a DNS entry (and TLS certificate) for an xn---masked name that turns into the name of the target when processed by idna 0.5.0 or earlier.
Remedy
Upgrade to idna 1.0.3 or later, if depending on idna directly, or to url 2.5.4 or later, if depending on idna via url. (This issue was fixed in idna 1.0.0, but versions earlier than 1.0.3 are not recommended for other reasons.)
There is a security vulnerability with
idna
< 1.0.0. See GHSA ID: h97m-ww89-6jmq.About the Vulnerability
idna
0.5.0 and earlier accepts Punycode labels that do not produce any non-ASCII output, which means that either ASCII labels or the empty root label can be masked such that they appear unequal without IDNA processing or when processed with a different implementation and equal when processed with idna 0.5.0 or earlier.Concretely,
example.org
andxn--example-.org
become equal after processing byidna
0.5.0 or earlier. Also,example.org.xn--
andexample.org
. become equal after processing byidna
0.5.0 or earlier.In applications using
idna
(but not inidna
itself) this may be able to lead to privilege escalation when host name comparison is part of a privilege check and the behavior is combined with a client that resolves domains with such labels instead of treating them as errors that preclude DNS resolution / URL fetching and with the attacker managing to introduce a DNS entry (and TLS certificate) for anxn--
-masked name that turns into the name of the target when processed byidna
0.5.0 or earlier.Remedy
Upgrade to
idna
1.0.3 or later, if depending onidna
directly, or tourl
2.5.4 or later, if depending onidna
viaurl
. (This issue was fixed inidna
1.0.0, but versions earlier than 1.0.3 are not recommended for other reasons.)When upgrading, please take a moment to read about alternative Unicode back ends for idna.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: