Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion about social column in footer: sharing vs links #12

Open
pydanny opened this issue Oct 4, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Discussion about social column in footer: sharing vs links #12

pydanny opened this issue Oct 4, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@pydanny
Copy link
Contributor

pydanny commented Oct 4, 2021

The "Social" column in the footer is probably intended as typical social media links. But what if instead we used those as sharing options. Thoughts?

@pydanny pydanny changed the title Social discussion: sharing vs links Discussion about social column in footer: sharing vs links Oct 4, 2021
audreyfeldroy pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2021
fix: remove lg:block (redundant class)
@MilanAgrawal
Copy link

hello the links are not present in the social column in the footer

@MilanAgrawal
Copy link

sharing options would be good too but i think it would be also nice to keep the social media links as people get to know more about the organization and its works

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants