You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to merge our libraries for GFF/GTF and SAM/BAM into one. There's also some development of fast FASTA/FASTQ parser going on (see this thread http://forum.dlang.org/thread/[email protected]).
However, code styles are way too different. I've tried to sketch how interfaces should look like (in my opinion) in this gist: https://gist.github.com/lomereiter/5025051 - shouldn't be too hard to make such wrappers on top of existing code.
Waiting for your comments ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, I was thinking the same thing - that we should merge all the libraries into one, say a BioD library :) Until there is something comparable to RubyGems for D, which we could then use for creating something comparable to biogems.
I don't think just making a wrapper would be a good solution, as then we would have to maintain even more code. We should definitely make a goal to merge them, and decide on a common interface style, and maybe even merge all tools into a DBioTools package of some sort...
Hi Marjan,
I would like to merge our libraries for GFF/GTF and SAM/BAM into one. There's also some development of fast FASTA/FASTQ parser going on (see this thread http://forum.dlang.org/thread/[email protected]).
However, code styles are way too different. I've tried to sketch how interfaces should look like (in my opinion) in this gist: https://gist.github.com/lomereiter/5025051 - shouldn't be too hard to make such wrappers on top of existing code.
Waiting for your comments ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: