You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've just installed the latest miab about a week ago with a first domain and have been adding additional existing domains since. I'm using cloudflare dns for all the additional domains. This has gone well for all my mostly unused domains, but today I encountered something odd with a domain that includes a website.
For the domain manyedges.com I have a website that I want to continue to support. As a result, I've used the admin site to ask miab to customize the zone file to include a CNAME record for @ and www. that will point to the domain's main website.
But it seems that status_checks.py / check_dns_zone() is unhappy about this and grades the resulting zone file has having an error. The code seems to look for an A record for @ pointing to the box ip addr. If it is not the case, it treats this as an error.
Should we treat this as a miab bug/limitation, or should I just shrug this off, or... ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've just installed the latest miab about a week ago with a first domain and have been adding additional existing domains since. I'm using cloudflare dns for all the additional domains. This has gone well for all my mostly unused domains, but today I encountered something odd with a domain that includes a website.
For the domain manyedges.com I have a website that I want to continue to support. As a result, I've used the admin site to ask miab to customize the zone file to include a CNAME record for @ and www. that will point to the domain's main website.
But it seems that status_checks.py / check_dns_zone() is unhappy about this and grades the resulting zone file has having an error. The code seems to look for an A record for @ pointing to the box ip addr. If it is not the case, it treats this as an error.
Should we treat this as a miab bug/limitation, or should I just shrug this off, or... ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: