Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Calculating Acres improperly #9

Open
bjwheeler opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Calculating Acres improperly #9

bjwheeler opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@bjwheeler
Copy link

Since upgrading to the latest version for WAB 2.8, the acres being generated appear to be incorrect. Totals are almost double of what one would expect. Using ArcGIS Enterprise 10.5.1.

@bjwheeler
Copy link
Author

using the demo tool on this site - https://apps.magis.nc/demo/eDraw/ - I experience the same issue with calculations of acres being reported incorrectly.

@kevinsagis
Copy link

I am seeing incorrect lengths being reported on my site and the demo MAGIC site on known lengths of features on the esri basemap. I suspect a bug with a newer API vers. I am using 3.27 on WAB 2.10 DE. Will continue to research.

@caseybentz8
Copy link

I am seeing incorrect lengths being reported as well, both on my site and the demo app. We have a one mile grid system that I use for testing lengths. The Esri measurement widget reports the correct distance and just around 5280', while the eDraw widget is returning 7250'.

@kevinsagis
Copy link

See the comments here... it was measuring in the wrong wkid as I suspected...

https://community.esri.com/message/460135-edraw-widget#comment-828182

Let us know how it works for you when you update the widget Casey. I can confirm it is working now for me.

@caseybentz8
Copy link

Thank you for the reply, I was running version 2.8.1, and with 2.11 it is working as expected. Thanks for the great widget.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants