Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using ICA-AROMA after preprocessing #72

Open
NewAnts opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Using ICA-AROMA after preprocessing #72

NewAnts opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@NewAnts
Copy link

NewAnts commented Dec 6, 2023

Hi,

We have recently completed preprocessing our functional data using the default fmriprep pipeline. However, we've noted that the current version of fmriprep does not include ICA-AROMA. We are interested in implementing ICA-AROMA on this already preprocessed functional data. Would it be possible to apply ICA-AROMA at this stage of our processing workflow?

Thank you in advance for your assistance!

@maartenmennes
Copy link
Owner

I'm not too familiar with the default fmriprep pipeline, but I would say yes, this should be possible. Our experience was that AROMA was best implemented before highpass filtering and any further nuisance regression. If these steps have already been implemented in the standard pipeline I'd carefully check the output of the AROMA classifier to make sure the component selection still makes sense.

@NewAnts
Copy link
Author

NewAnts commented Dec 6, 2023

The default pipeline does include high pass filtering and compcor regressors

@maartenmennes
Copy link
Owner

I would be hesitant to use AROMA after compcor. I'm wondering how separable signal related to head motion will still be after the compcor regression. This will no doubt have an impact on the AROMA classifier. We've never validated it for this kind of usage. That said, there is no penalty in trying, other than very carefully checking the output as indicated above.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants