Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

better converter support. #13839

Closed
mrGoodWolf opened this issue Sep 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

better converter support. #13839

mrGoodWolf opened this issue Sep 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
Action / change needed Code still needs changes (PR) / more information requested (Issues) Feature request Issues that request the addition or enhancement of a feature Won't add The feature request was rejected and will not be added.

Comments

@mrGoodWolf
Copy link

Problem

I'm writing a minecraft to minetest mod converter (a extremely tiring process).

Solutions

i was wondering if someone implement a
function to deal with @sideonly to help I know it will be hard but I completely understand if you can't do it.coding is hard.

Alternatives

i can of any way to do it without embedding it into lua API.

Additional context

No response

@mrGoodWolf mrGoodWolf added the Feature request Issues that request the addition or enhancement of a feature label Sep 23, 2023
@rubenwardy
Copy link
Contributor

What is sideonly? Please provide more context that doesn't require Minecraft domain knowledge

@Zughy Zughy added the Action / change needed Code still needs changes (PR) / more information requested (Issues) label Sep 23, 2023
@mrGoodWolf
Copy link
Author

The files are stripped of unnecessary code based on the @SideOnly annotation. Modders can use @SideOnly annotation to mark those things (classes, methods and/or fields) which should only be loaded on a specific side.

@rubenwardy
Copy link
Contributor

rubenwardy commented Sep 24, 2023

That didn't really answer the question. I googled this API, and side here means "Server" or "Client". Mods in Minetest are server-side only, therefore such a feature does not make sense yet

For the ability for mods to run client-side code, see SSCSM #5393

@rubenwardy rubenwardy closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 24, 2023
@rubenwardy rubenwardy added the Won't add The feature request was rejected and will not be added. label Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Action / change needed Code still needs changes (PR) / more information requested (Issues) Feature request Issues that request the addition or enhancement of a feature Won't add The feature request was rejected and will not be added.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants