Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Splitting RTMP Service Methods into separate pages for each service? #13

Open
frostycpu opened this issue Jun 26, 2014 · 9 comments
Open

Comments

@frostycpu
Copy link
Member

Would it be a good idea to split https://github.com/loldevs/leaguespec/wiki/RTMP-Service-Methods into multiple pages?

@Divi
Copy link
Member

Divi commented Jun 27, 2014

I don't think so, the page is not too long. And the best advantage is that someone can copy/paste the whole page in a few second, cloning the repository is not needed.

@jaagupkymmel
Copy link
Contributor

I think the best way would be to split it into multiple pages, but retain one parent page, which would include the basic description of its methods (the tables) as well as links to each services' page.

@Divi
Copy link
Member

Divi commented Jun 27, 2014

Tables may be desynchronized (the table must be duplicated) if someone forget to update the main page, or the dedicated page.

@frostycpu
Copy link
Member Author

I think desynchronization shouldn't be that big of an issue. I'd really like to add some more information to the page but it's tedious right now to add anything to that big page. jaagupkymmel's suggestion is pretty good in my opninion.

@Divi
Copy link
Member

Divi commented Jul 7, 2014

I didn't think about new data, 👍 then :)

@Valandur
Copy link

Valandur commented Jul 7, 2014

+1 for this, although some pages might have barely any content...

@Valandur
Copy link

I moved the first five services into their own pages. Waiting for feedback now, if it's good I guess we can move the rest aswell.
We'll still have to think about what we want on the parent page, and what not.

@jaagupkymmel
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good!

@frostycpu
Copy link
Member Author

Ya looks good so far =]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants