-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 364
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Git LFS usage #2074
Comments
As a part of this, it would be great to get rid of the |
Another idea is to have a separate repo and and artifact containing various test data. Not sure what the technical benefit, but it has aesthetic appeal to me for some reason. |
related: geotrellis/geotrellis-chatta-demo#42 |
Do we still want to keep it open? GIT LFS is very limited in downloads in its free version. |
We should close this. LocationTech is very reluctant in supporting git LFS for their repos and free tier is woefully insufficient. I think we could use our own version of test utility which downloads test files from s3 and validate checksums such that we can avoid checking any more rasters in. |
We can use Git-LFS for test data files, that may improve repository cloning speed / test data versioning / etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: