Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: Disable the lstn in command in favor of lstn scan for now #211

Open
fntlnz opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Proposal: Disable the lstn in command in favor of lstn scan for now #211

fntlnz opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@fntlnz
Copy link
Contributor

fntlnz commented Apr 12, 2023

It looks like the lstn in command is giving headhaches to some of our users.

Screenshot 2023-04-12 at 15 25 59

Initially we thought about the lstn in command as our main entrypoint for repositories, that command is very interesting to execute because it goes in-depth with the scan by analysing all the transitive dependencies directly.

However to make it working properly we need to complete the work on https://github.com/listendev/erborist.

So I'm proposing to disable lstn in and suggest users to use lstn scan instead.

lstn scan gives the same kind of result of lstn in and takes the same input, the only difference is that it will not directly require all the transitive dependencies to the analysis request.

Once we finish the work on erborist we can re-enable the command and advise users on using it.

What do you all think?

@fntlnz fntlnz changed the title Proposal> Disable the lstn in command in favor of lstn scan for now Proposal: Disable the lstn in command in favor of lstn scan for now Apr 12, 2023
@listendev listendev deleted a comment from samvchai Apr 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant