We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Here is my pseudocode:
const { compactTodoStorageFile } = require('@lint-todo/utils'); try { compactTodoStorageFile(); } catch { write empty .lint-todo } INCLUDE_TODO=1 eslint with junit output junit for dirty .lint-todo's
While this works (thanks for compactTodoStorageFile by the way!), it would be nice if I could do:
compactTodoStorageFile
INCLUDE_TODO=1 COMPACT_TODO=1 eslint with junit output junit for dirty .lint-todo's
But since COMPACT_TODO is an early exit, it has to be a two step process. The workaround works fine if you want to close this. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This seems reasonable. The idea was to really minimize the work done via the actual linting process.
I'll put some thought into the potential impact of this.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Hey Wondering if there was ever any thoughts on this and potential work that was done. Would love to see this done. Thanks!
No branches or pull requests
Here is my pseudocode:
While this works (thanks for
compactTodoStorageFile
by the way!), it would be nice if I could do:But since COMPACT_TODO is an early exit, it has to be a two step process. The workaround works fine if you want to close this. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: