We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In the OAuth flow we first ask the user to login and then to consent for the asked scopes.
For external Lenra clients, the only scope asked for is app:websocket that does not really give access to user information.
app:websocket
To give a better user experience to our users we will skip the consent page when the only asked scope is app:websocket.
See if Hydra manages skipping consent in the acceptation of the connection.
If not we can validate the consent when loading the consent page, but it's not the best solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
What should be done
In the OAuth flow we first ask the user to login and then to consent for the asked scopes.
For external Lenra clients, the only scope asked for is
app:websocket
that does not really give access to user information.To give a better user experience to our users we will skip the consent page when the only asked scope is
app:websocket
.Technical recommandation
See if Hydra manages skipping consent in the acceptation of the connection.
If not we can validate the consent when loading the consent page, but it's not the best solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: