You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm experimenting with LCache on our high traffic site. This is either a question or a feature request.
Are there any performance gains when using igbinary as the APCu serializer? It is easy to install and enable igbinary in place of the PHP serializer. However, when I did so, it brought the database server to its knees with 100% CPU usage.
In theory, igbinary should improve performance and lower memory usage, though I'm not familiar enough with APCu to know how it stores/compacts cached keys.
Curious to know if anyone has tried this configuration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@kevinlisota What versions of PHP, APCu, and igbinary are you running?
I'm using igbinary as the serializer for APCu without issue (so far) in all my local test environments - with basically zero traffic though.
While I haven't seen any blatant increase in CPU cycles myself I will definitely keep a closer eye on this now that you've mentioned it - especially during load testing.
I'm experimenting with LCache on our high traffic site. This is either a question or a feature request.
Are there any performance gains when using igbinary as the APCu serializer? It is easy to install and enable igbinary in place of the PHP serializer. However, when I did so, it brought the database server to its knees with 100% CPU usage.
In theory, igbinary should improve performance and lower memory usage, though I'm not familiar enough with APCu to know how it stores/compacts cached keys.
Curious to know if anyone has tried this configuration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: