Publish on CRAN? #16
Replies: 5 comments
-
It has not been a top priority of mine but I might take a look at what's needed in order to be accepted by CRAN. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'd encourage you to release on CRAN. I think that a majority of R users only uses packages from CRAN (via install.packages() ), and so won't use your package. The CRAN requirements are not that high -- mainly documentation, a clean list of dependencies (in the DESCRIPTION file), and a willingness to fix issues that they see in their test infrastructure (e. g. when there were changes in base R after a new release). The latter in particular is a very beneficial feature, I think. Essentially, you'll see what is missing by running
on the tarball (from |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It's now available on CRAN. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Congratulations! I just checked back on your repo after about 6 months and my timing is impeccable. Well done, I know the CRAN hoops can be quite challenging. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Great! (Your package is now also listed in the Finance Task View, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have said it before: it's good to see an up-to-date pure-R implementation of the IB API.
Just out of curiosity: have you considered publishing your package on CRAN?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions