You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the if one would like multiple conda environments available to the workflow, you can build them into the main docker image (e.g. with conda-env-builder, then activate them as part of each subprocess call. It would be nicer if you could decorate tasks such that a named conda environment could be activated, or a path to a specific environment.yml could be given such that latch would pre-build the environment then activate it (bonus points for knowing when to rebuild if the yml changes). Both of these would improve code readability quite a bit as well as support easier reproducible workflows.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the if one would like multiple conda environments available to the workflow, you can build them into the main docker image (e.g. with
conda-env-builder
, then activate them as part of each subprocess call. It would be nicer if you could decorate tasks such that a named conda environment could be activated, or a path to a specificenvironment.yml
could be given such that latch would pre-build the environment then activate it (bonus points for knowing when to rebuild if the yml changes). Both of these would improve code readability quite a bit as well as support easier reproducible workflows.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: