Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support same model with multiple providers #1765

Closed
2 tasks done
L929333353 opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Support same model with multiple providers #1765

L929333353 opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
💪 enhancement New feature or request no-issue-activity Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed

Comments

@L929333353
Copy link

Self Checks

Description of the new feature / enhancement

Support same model with multiple providers

Scenario when this would be used?

Same model with multiple providers

Supporting information

No response

@L929333353 L929333353 added the 💪 enhancement New feature or request label Dec 18, 2023
@crazywoola
Copy link
Member

Can you explain a little on this? Because I am not sure what you are going to achieve.

@L929333353
Copy link
Author

I got same model named vicuna-13b, but in 2 different provider end point server.

@crazywoola
Copy link
Member

You mean using hf and replicate?

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Close due to it's no longer active, if you have any questions, you can reopen it.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-issue-activity Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed label Jan 3, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as completed Jan 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
💪 enhancement New feature or request no-issue-activity Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants