Skip to content

Commit c974c13

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #465 from HagayVider1/MTV-921-Release-notes-2-5-5
MTV-921 release notes 2 5 5
2 parents 19bb335 + 925a4f3 commit c974c13

File tree

1 file changed

+12
-9
lines changed

1 file changed

+12
-9
lines changed

documentation/modules/rn-2.5.adoc

Lines changed: 12 additions & 9 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ The old UI of MTV 2.3 cannot be enabled by setting `feature_ui: true` in Forklif
3838

3939
.Errors logged in populator pods are improved
4040

41-
// thanks Arik.
4241
In previous releases of {project-short} {project-version}, populator pods were always restarted on failure. This made it difficult to gather the logs from the failed pods. In {project-short} 2.5.3, the number of restarts of populator pods is limited to three times. On the third and final time, the populator pod remains in the fail status and its logs can then be easily gathered by must-gather and by forklift-controller to know this step has failed. link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-818[(MTV-818)]
4342

4443
[id="new-features-and-enhancements-25_{context}"]
@@ -48,6 +47,7 @@ This release has the following features and improvements:
4847

4948
.Migration using OVA files created by VMware vSphere
5049

50+
5151
// i need to wait for this ticket to be merged to add a link
5252
In {project-short} {project-version}, you can migrate using Open Virtual Appliance (OVA) files that were created by VMware vSphere as source providers. link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-336[(MTV-336)]
5353

@@ -127,14 +127,19 @@ When migrating VMs that are installed with RHEL 9 as guest operating system from
127127

128128
When adding an OVA provider, the error message `ConnectionTestFailed` may instantly appear, although the provider is created successfully. If the message does not disappear after a few minutes and the provider status does not move to `Ready`, this means that the `ova server pod creation` has failed. link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-671[(MTV-671)]
129129

130-
For a complete list of all known issues in this release, see the list of link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-740?filter=12424645[Known Issues] in Jira.
130+
For a complete list of all known issues in this release, see the list of link:https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?filter=12424645[Known Issues] in Jira.
131131

132132

133133
[id="resolved-issues-25_{context}"]
134134
== Resolved issues
135135

136136
This release has the following resolved issues:
137137

138+
.Flaw was found in jsrsasign package which is vulnerable to Observable Discrepancy
139+
140+
Versions of the package `jsrsasign` before 11.0.0, used in previous releases of {project-short}, are vulnerable to Observable Discrepancy in the RSA PKCS1.5 or RSA-OAEP decryption process. This discrepancy means an attacker could decrypt ciphertexts by exploiting this vulnerability. However, exploiting this vulnerability requires the attacker to have access to a large number of ciphertexts encrypted with the same key. This issue has been resolved in {project-short} 2.5.5 by upgrading the package `jsrasign` to version 11.0.0.
141+
142+
For more information, see link:https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-21484[CVE-2024-21484].
138143

139144
.Multiple HTTP/2 enabled web servers are vulnerable to a DDoS attack (Rapid Reset Attack)
140145

@@ -147,8 +152,7 @@ For more information, see link:https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-4
147152

148153
.Gin Web Framework does not properly sanitize filename parameter of Context.FileAttachment function
149154

150-
A flaw was found in the Gin-Gonic Gin Web Framework, used by {project-short}. The filename parameter of the `Context.FileAttachment` function was not properly sanitized. This flaw in the package could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions caused by improper input validation by the filename parameter of the `Context.FileAttachment` function.  A maliciously created filename could cause the `Content-Disposition` header to be sent with an unexpected filename value, or otherwise modify the `Content-Disposition` header.
151-
155+
A flaw was found in the Gin-Gonic Gin Web Framework, used by {project-short}. The filename parameter of the `Context.FileAttachment` function was not properly sanitized. This flaw in the package could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions caused by improper input validation by the filename parameter of the `Context.FileAttachment` function. A maliciously created filename could cause the `Content-Disposition` header to be sent with an unexpected filename value, or otherwise modify the `Content-Disposition` header.
152156

153157
This issue has been resolved in {project-short} 2.5.2. It is advised to update to this version of {project-short} or later.
154158

@@ -225,7 +229,7 @@ This issue has been resolved in {project-short} 2.5.3.
225229

226230
In previous releases of {project-short} {project-version}, the filesystem overhead for new persistent volumes was hard-coded to 10%. The overhead was insufficient for certain filesystem types, resulting in failures during cold-migrations from RHV and OSP to the cluster where {project-short} is deployed. In other filesystem types, the hard-coded overhead was too high, resulting in excessive storage consumption.
227231

228-
In {project-short} 2.5.3, the filesystem overhead can be configured and is no longer hard-coded. If your migration allocates persistent volumes without CDI, you can adjust the file system overhead. You adjust the file system overhead by adding the following label and value to the `spec` portion of the `forklift-controller ` CR`:
232+
In {project-short} 2.5.3, the filesystem overhead can be configured and is no longer hard-coded. If your migration allocates persistent volumes without CDI, you can adjust the file system overhead. You adjust the file system overhead by adding the following label and value to the `spec` portion of the `forklift-controller ` CR`:
229233

230234
[source, YAML]
231235
----
@@ -257,13 +261,13 @@ This issue is resolved in {project-short} {project-version}, the snapshots gener
257261

258262
In previous releases of {project-short}, the cutover operation failed when it was triggered while precopy was being performed. The VM was locked in {rhv-short} and therefore the `ovirt-engine` rejected the snapshot creation, or disk transfer, operation.
259263

260-
This issue is resolved in {project-short} {project-version}, the cutover operation is triggered, but it is not performed at that time because the VM is locked. Once the precopy operation completes, the cutover operation is triggered. link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-686[(MTV-686)]
264+
This issue is resolved in {project-short} {project-version}, the cutover operation is triggered, but it is not performed at that time because the VM is locked. Once the precopy operation completes, the cutover operation is triggered. link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-686[(MTV-686)]
261265

262266
.Warm migration fails when VM is locked
263267

264268
In previous releases of {project-short}, triggering a warm migration while there was an ongoing operation in {rhv-short} that locked the VM caused the migration to fail because the snapshot creation could not be triggered.
265269

266-
This issue is resolved in {project-short} {project-version}, warm migration does not fail when an operation that locks the VM is performed in {rhv-short}. The migration does not fail, but starts when the VM is unlocked. link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-687[(MTV-687)]
270+
This issue is resolved in {project-short} {project-version}, warm migration does not fail when an operation that locks the VM is performed in {rhv-short}. The migration does not fail, but starts when the VM is unlocked. link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-687[(MTV-687)]
267271

268272
.Deleting migrated VM does not remove PVC and PV
269273

@@ -287,8 +291,7 @@ This issue is resolved in {project-short} {project-version}, VM with multiple di
287291
.Transfer network not taken into account for cold migrations from vSphere
288292
In {project-short} releases 2.4.0-2.5.3, cold migrations from vSphere to the local cluster on which {project-short} was deployed did not take a specified transfer network into account. This issue is resolved in {project-short} 2.5.4. link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-846[(MTV-846)]
289293

290-
291-
For a complete list of all resolved issues in this release, see the list of link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MTV-666?filter=12424644[Resolved Issues] in Jira.
294+
For a complete list of all resolved issues in this release, see the list of link:https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?filter=12424644[Resolved Issues] in Jira.
292295

293296
[id="upgrade-notes-25_{context}"]
294297
== Upgrade notes

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)