Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Statusz for Kubernetes Components #4827

Open
5 of 9 tasks
richabanker opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 12 comments
Open
5 of 9 tasks

Statusz for Kubernetes Components #4827

richabanker opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 12 comments
Assignees
Labels
lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release sig/instrumentation Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Instrumentation.
Milestone

Comments

@richabanker
Copy link
Contributor

richabanker commented Sep 6, 2024

Enhancement Description

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Sep 6, 2024
@richabanker
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign

@richabanker
Copy link
Contributor Author

/sig instrumentation

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/instrumentation Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Instrumentation. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Sep 6, 2024
@aojea
Copy link
Member

aojea commented Sep 7, 2024

logistic question for sig-instrumentation folks, don't you prefer to consolidate all statusz, flagz and featurez in a single kep to avoid the overhead?
or is that there is risk for something to not be graduated at the same time?

@logicalhan
Copy link
Member

logistic question for sig-instrumentation folks, don't you prefer to consolidate all statusz, flagz and featurez in a single kep to avoid the overhead? or is that there is risk for something to not be graduated at the same time?

No, some pages may be more contentious than the others. Centralizing z-pages itself has been agreed to be of general benefit to the community (rather than one offs in the kubelet).

@dgrisonnet dgrisonnet added the lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release label Sep 19, 2024
@impact-maker
Copy link
Member

impact-maker commented Oct 1, 2024

Hello @richabanker 👋, Enhancements team here.

Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 02:00 UTC Friday 11th October 2024 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 10th October 2024.

This enhancement is targeting for stage alpha for v1.32 (correct me, if otherwise).

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • KEP readme using the latest template has been merged into the k/enhancements repo.
  • KEP status is marked as implementable for latest-milestone: v1.32.
  • KEP readme has up-to-date graduation criteria
  • KEP has a production readiness review that has been completed and merged into k/enhancements. (For more information on the PRR process, check here). If your production readiness review is not completed yet, please make sure to fill the production readiness questionnaire in your KEP by the PRR Freeze deadline on Thursday, October 3rd, 2024 so that the PRR team has enough time to review your KEP.

For this KEP, we would just need to update the following:

  • KEP has a production readiness review that has been completed and merged into k/enhancements.

The status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for enhancement freeze. Please keep the issue description up-to-date with appropriate stages as well.

If you anticipate missing enhancements freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you!

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member

pacoxu commented Oct 11, 2024

/milestone v1.32

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.32 milestone Oct 11, 2024
@edithturn
Copy link

Hello @richabanker , 👋🏼 this is Edith from the v1.32 Communications Team!

We’d love for you to consider writing a feature blog about your enhancement! ✍
Some reasons why you might want to write a blog for this feature include (but are not limited to) if this introduces breaking changes, is important to our users, or has been in progress for a long time and is graduating.

To opt-in, let us know and open a Feature Blog placeholder PR against the website repository by 30th Oct 2024 🗓 . For more information about writing a blog, see the blog contribution guidelines.

Note: In your placeholder PR, use XX characters for the blog date in the front matter and file name. We will work with you on updating the PR with the publication date once we have a final number of feature blogs for this release.

@rdalbuquerque
Copy link

Hello @richabanker 👋, 1.32 Docs Shadow here.
Does this enhancement work planned for 1.32 require any new docs or modification to existing docs?
If so, please follows the steps here to open a PR against dev-1.32 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Thursday October 24th 2024 18:00 PDT.
Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release.
Thank you!

@richabanker
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rdalbuquerque Created a docs PR here kubernetes/website#48368, thanks!

@richabanker
Copy link
Contributor Author

@edithturn Created a blog PR here kubernetes/website#48369, thanks!

@tjons
Copy link
Contributor

tjons commented Nov 4, 2024

Hey again @richabanker 👋 v1.32 Enhancements team here,

Just checking in as we approach code freeze at 02:00 UTC Friday 8th November 2024 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 7th November 2024 .

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • All PRs to the Kubernetes repo that are related to your enhancement are linked in the above issue description (for tracking purposes).
  • All PR/s are ready to be merged (they have approved and lgtm labels applied) by the code freeze deadline. This includes tests.

For this enhancement, it looks like the following PRs are open and need to be merged before code freeze (and we need to update the Issue description to include all the related PRs of this KEP):

Additionally, please let me know if there are any other PRs in k/k not listed in the description or not linked with this GitHub issue that we should track for this KEP, so that we can maintain accurate status.

The status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for code freeze.

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you!

@tjons
Copy link
Contributor

tjons commented Nov 8, 2024

Hello @richabanker 👋, Enhancements team here.

With all the implementation(code related) PRs merged as per the issue description:

This enhancement is now marked as tracked for code freeze for the 1.32 Code Freeze!

Please note that KEPs targeting stable need to have the status field marked as implemented in the kep.yaml file after code PRs are merged and the feature gates are removed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release sig/instrumentation Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Instrumentation.
Projects
Status: Tracked for code freeze
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants