-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 424
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
applyconfiguration-gen generates incorrect Extract...Status() #173
Comments
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
This has tested with 0.29.4, 0.30.0, and the current master branch.
applyconfiguration-gen generates (experimental!) ExtractXYZ() and ExtractXYZStatus() functions that take an object and deliver an applyconfiguration that only has those fields prefilled that are owned by a given field manager.
The ExtractXYZStatus() does not extract conditions correctly. In the status of our CRD we have standard Kubernetes conditions:
In an object that has one condition set by a controller using SSA, a subsequent reconcile by the same controller (using the same field manager value in both cases) calls ExtractXYZStatus(), which extracts all other owned fields correctly, but the Conditions slice is always nil in the output applyconfiguration. This has the effect that every time the controller wants to set any other field in the status, it inadvertantly clears its own conditions.
Instead I would expect that the applyconfiguration contains the condition previously set by the same controller.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: