Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

log format inconsistent between components #170

Open
jichenjc opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

log format inconsistent between components #170

jichenjc opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

Comments

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

cloudusr@jitest19:~$ kubectl logs vn-agent-p6gqv -n vc-manager
I0711 10:26:39.325504       1 cert.go:61] Using self-signed cert (/etc/vn-agent/vn.crt, /etc/vn-agent/vn.key)
I0711 10:26:39.325587       1 server.go:127] server listen on :10550
cloudusr@jitest19:~$
cloudusr@jitest19:~$ kubectl logs vc-manager-76c5878465-bwq2t -n vc-manager
{"level":"info","ts":1625999191.3924062,"logger":"entrypoint","msg":"setting up client for manager"}
{"level":"info","ts":1625999191.393097,"logger":"entrypoint","msg":"setting up manager"}
{"level":"info","ts":1625999192.0039604,"logger":"controller-runtime.metrics","msg":"metrics server is starting to listen","addr":":0"}
{"level":"info","ts":1625999192.0044432,"logger":"entrypoint","msg":"Registering Components."}
{"level":"info","ts":1625999192.0044632,"logger":"entrypoint","msg":"setting up scheme"}
{"level":"info","ts":1625999192.0047922,"logger":"entrypoint","msg":"Setting up controller"}
{"level":"info","ts":1625999192.0049727,"logger":"entrypoint","msg":"setting up webhooks"}
{"level":"info","ts":1625999192.045926,"logger":"virtualcluster-webhook","msg":"successfully created service/virtualcluster-webhook-service"}
{"level":"info","ts":1625999198.7617276,"logger":"virtualcluster-webhook","msg":"successfully generate certificate and key file"}
{"level":"info","ts":1625999198.7618213,"logger":"virtualcluster-webhook","msg":"will create validatingwebhookconfiguration/virtua

User Story

As a [developer/user/operator] I would like to [high level description] for [reasons]

Detailed Description

[A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.]

Anything else you would like to add:

[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]

/kind feature

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jul 12, 2021
@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor Author

not a big deal ,but to be consistent seems better

@christopherhein
Copy link
Contributor

Definitely agree, consistency would be great!

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 25, 2021
@christopherhein
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Oct 26, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants