Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use the typescript port of the JS client in the demo #18

Open
monperrus opened this issue Jan 26, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

use the typescript port of the JS client in the demo #18

monperrus opened this issue Jan 26, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@monperrus
Copy link
Contributor

we are porting part of https://github.com/verificatum/verificatum-vjsc to typescript and splitting into modules.

the prototype is still on Douglas' computer.

we would push it to a new repo say verificatum-vjsc-ng (or verificatum-vjsc-ts or verificatum-vtsc), to be decided

the demonstrator will use the new TS code instead of the old JS code

license will be strong to allow for commercialization, say AGPL + full copyrights

@monperrus monperrus changed the title document the typescript port of the JS client use the typescript port of the JS client in the demo Feb 7, 2022
@monperrus monperrus assigned monperrus and algomaster99 and unassigned monperrus Feb 7, 2022
@Jacarte
Copy link
Contributor

Jacarte commented Feb 7, 2022

Cool !

One interesting thing that we could take into account, right now only muladd is ported to Wasm. Since there is a plan to migrate verificatum to typescript, why not to fully compile it into Wasm following the typeset of AssemblyScript, https://www.assemblyscript.org/ ?

We will only need to annotate (if it is possible) the parameters and returning of functions to AssemblyScript types. We could have language diversification by having a hybrid JS-Wasm as a whole and CROW and wasm-mutate for the Wasm pieces.

@algomaster99
Copy link
Collaborator

algomaster99 commented May 29, 2023

Link to the TS port - https://github.com/verificatum/verificatum-vts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants