Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Macros or multiple includes? #40

Open
kpu opened this issue Nov 28, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Macros or multiple includes? #40

kpu opened this issue Nov 28, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@kpu
Copy link
Owner

kpu commented Nov 28, 2019

We have two means of creating functions for different architectures: macros (as currently used for multiplication) and repeated inclusion (as currently used for kernels). They're both sort of hacky, but I think multiple inclusion is cleaner. It lets us have a function without a backslash at the end of the line and edit it like a function. Can we switch multiply to be multiple inclusion?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant