You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have two means of creating functions for different architectures: macros (as currently used for multiplication) and repeated inclusion (as currently used for kernels). They're both sort of hacky, but I think multiple inclusion is cleaner. It lets us have a function without a backslash at the end of the line and edit it like a function. Can we switch multiply to be multiple inclusion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have two means of creating functions for different architectures: macros (as currently used for multiplication) and repeated inclusion (as currently used for kernels). They're both sort of hacky, but I think multiple inclusion is cleaner. It lets us have a function without a backslash at the end of the line and edit it like a function. Can we switch multiply to be multiple inclusion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: