Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Patch for /trunk/Subseq_cover.cpp #8

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 30, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Patch for /trunk/Subseq_cover.cpp #8

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 30, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
auto-migrated Type-Patch

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link 

Since all the elements in Q is distinct, we would go into this if statement 
only once, so there is no need and will never update a existed value res twice.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 21 Apr 2013 at 8:44

Attachments:
@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author 

I am not so sure about this one since although all elements in Q are distinct, 
we may have duplicate elements in A such that we may update D.back() which 
means we need to check that.

Original comment by [email protected] on 1 May 2013 at 12:31

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
auto-migrated Type-Patch
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@GoogleCodeExporter