Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I actually changed it to make it clear they were generated names, and in principle not something one would use directly. Apart from that, simply prepending |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
In any case, I’m OK with changing the names to more readable ones if we expect people to use those classes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Currently, we are generating names that are valid when Unicode escaped.
However, they could be a bit awkward to use if a user of KopyKat wants to use the generated type. For instance, someone may create an extension function on the Mutable type.
So, in here, it may make more sense to use the name
MutablePerson
instead.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions