You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Example 9 is not complete, as the weight is not rendered as a field. Furthermore, is it necessary to create a field for "Item"? We think it just adds confusion. Related to this: is nesting in fields really necessary?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Example 9 is not complete, as the weight is not rendered as a field.
Indeed, this should be added.
Furthermore, is it necessary to create a field for "Item"? We think it just adds confusion. Related to this: is nesting in fields really necessary?
The nesting is indeed necessary. Without the nesting we will get a Cartesian product of the types and weights for items. This is precisely one of the use cases for fields.
Example 9 is not complete, as the weight is not rendered as a field. Furthermore, is it necessary to create a field for "Item"? We think it just adds confusion. Related to this: is nesting in fields really necessary?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: