You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The “About” says this project is “Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench”,but website https://code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench returns 404.
I found unixbench score in this project has better linearity than the official one, so it is more suitable for evaluating the performance of multi-core architecture CPUs . I would like to recommend this project to my customers
So is this project an official project?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
so it is more suitable for evaluating the performance of multi-core architecture CPUs
Benchmarks are benchmarks and have specific utility when used properly. Comparing numbers from wildly different environments is not as accurate. Anyway, those not interested in taking a scientific approach tend to "interpret" benchmarks in ways that fit their desired narratives, no matter the differences in environments.
So is this project an official project?
Yes, this project is maintained, for some definitions of maintained. I am uncertain about your desired narrative for the meaning of "official". You may interpret that as you like.
I found this project diffrent from the officical project as below
https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive-downloads/v2/code.google.com/byte-unixbench/UnixBench5.1.3.tgz
The “About” says this project is “Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench”,but website https://code.google.com/p/byte-unixbench returns 404.
I found unixbench score in this project has better linearity than the official one, so it is more suitable for evaluating the performance of multi-core architecture CPUs . I would like to recommend this project to my customers
So is this project an official project?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: