Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Polygon geometry in "annotatielijn" type of Annotatie #74

Open
szmucha opened this issue Dec 9, 2019 · 7 comments
Open

Polygon geometry in "annotatielijn" type of Annotatie #74

szmucha opened this issue Dec 9, 2019 · 7 comments
Labels
KGO/eisen/wensen Ter beoordeling aan Klankbordgroep KLIC Volgende versie akkoord Aanpassing wordt beschikbaar gesteld in een volgende versie

Comments

@szmucha
Copy link

szmucha commented Dec 9, 2019

In few real klics the Annotatie object contains "Polygon" geometry (for the annotatielijn type). Based on "IMKL2015_Objectcatalogus_1.2.1.pdf" (Page 9) the Constraint: GeometrieLijnOfPunt defines that for this particular type we should have GM_Curve and for the Annotatie object possible geometries are: GM_Point and GM_Curve and based on: https://inspire-regadmin.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataspecification/ScopeObjectDetail.action?objectDetailId=11394 in my opinion this should be: Point and LineString in the GML notation.

Example klicNumber: 19G473111
Example of such object (gmlId): nl.imkl-KL1620.Annotatie-1207

@herman-vandenberg
Copy link

We have analyzed the network information supplied by this network operator (KL1620).
It appears that this network operator indeed frequently supplies Annotatie-objects with a polygon as geometry. This is not in accordance with the rules established for this by IMKL.
As you have established, KLIC does not currently validating this.
Our KLIC-helpdesk will contact them as soon as possible. But, until this network operator has supplied a new data set, this omission will still be present during KLIC-deliveries.

@herman-vandenberg
Copy link

After we have informed the network operator about this omission, today (11-12-2019) he has supplied adjusted network information.
In this network information we have NOT found any Annotatie-objects with geometry of the type 'Polygon'.

@szmucha
Copy link
Author

szmucha commented Dec 11, 2019

@herman-vandenberg thanks for information but I have one more very similar find. Object "Maatvoering" - exactly the same situation - Polygon where the Multiline should be provided.

Exemple klicNumber: 19G468490
Example of such object (gmlId): nl.imkl-GM0193.Maatvoering-908

@herman-vandenberg
Copy link

We tried to analyze the relevant KLIC request, but it was requested much longer than 20 working days ago. Deliveries older than 20 working days are cleaned up and therefore we no longer have access to the relevant requested network information.
Because the relevant network operator is making use of the services of our central facility, we have analyzed the most recent supplied network information (6 dec 2019). We detected that the are now not delivering any Maatvoering-objects at all.

@SiegDuPreez SiegDuPreez added the KGO/eisen/wensen Ter beoordeling aan Klankbordgroep KLIC label Dec 19, 2019
@herman-vandenberg
Copy link

Optie: valideren of de juiste geometrie wordt gebruikt bij aanvering van netinformatie (centraal) of beheerdersinformatie (decentraal).

@kad-scholm
Copy link
Contributor

Uit analyse in de centrale voorziening komen de volgende ongeldige geometrieen:
type | geometrietype | aantal
Annotatie | ST_MultiLineString | 3304
Annotatie | ST_Polygon | 3304
Maatvoering | ST_Polygon | 1839
EigenTopografie | ST_MultiLineString | 11
EigenTopografie | ST_MultiPolygon | 7

Van decentrale netbeheerders is dit onbekend.

Inschatting van kadaster is dat het qua performance haalbaar is om bij uploaden van centrale of decentrale netinformatie te valideren op geometrie type.

@FuatAkdeniz
Copy link

TCS KLIC 16 juni 2023
Kan een volgende versie van de upgrade opgenomen worden.

@kad-mahies kad-mahies added the Volgende versie akkoord Aanpassing wordt beschikbaar gesteld in een volgende versie label Feb 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
KGO/eisen/wensen Ter beoordeling aan Klankbordgroep KLIC Volgende versie akkoord Aanpassing wordt beschikbaar gesteld in een volgende versie
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants