You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My visualized workflow, working on editing/updating two (or more) sets of tags.
Right now multiple entries are sorted by date.
It'd be easier to see entry tags grouped, as they are the conceptual entity I'm working on.
The particular workflow I'm thinking of is a "progression" model, where one set of tags can be viewed while working on another set of tags.
Thanks @fourjay for the idea. I think this makes sense, though it reminds me that we have an open issue (#821) for a broader sort parameter. Ideally, if we implement that, it would be in a manner similar to other sort options so as to keep these arguments consistent.
Use Case/Motivation
My visualized workflow, working on editing/updating two (or more) sets of tags.
Right now multiple entries are sorted by date.
It'd be easier to see entry tags grouped, as they are the conceptual entity I'm working on.
The particular workflow I'm thinking of is a "progression" model, where one set of tags can be viewed while working on another set of tags.
Example Usage
jrnl @inbox @projects --group-by-tags --edit
Other Information
Given this option, it would make sense that the order of tags specified in the call would be honored in the output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: