You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 3, 2024. It is now read-only.
The fix is to change anywhere that the col_type is being compared to 187 to: record_desc_table(col).col_type in (180, 187) (several places in get_json)
or in one case: record_desc_table(col).col_type in (2,12,180,187)
Also, the DESCRIBE_COLUMNS3 procedure in Oracle now returns a col_type_name field, which may allow for the replacement of the numeric values with symbolic values that might be more portable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Oracle TIMESTAMP data type is sometimes numbered as 180 and sometimes as 187,
See: https://community.oracle.com/thread/914475?tstart=0
And for the definitive list: https://ellebaek.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/oracle-type-code-mappings/
The fix is to change anywhere that the
col_type
is being compared to 187 to:record_desc_table(col).col_type in (180, 187)
(several places in get_json)or in one case:
record_desc_table(col).col_type in (2,12,180,187)
Also, the
DESCRIBE_COLUMNS3
procedure in Oracle now returns acol_type_name
field, which may allow for the replacement of the numeric values with symbolic values that might be more portable.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: