-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sqltyped maintenance #11
Comments
Hi! It is not actively maintained at the moment. I still believe something like sqltyped is a good way to integrate with relational databases from a statically typed language. Unfortunately the I'm not developing sqltyped at the moment. The reason being that my current client is not using Scala (not One option which you might evaluate too is Slick. It is backed by Typesafe and is therefore "safer" solution with more guaranteed longevity. Slick will include type inference feature too. Please see slides 74 and 75: http://slick.typesafe.com/talks/2014-09-24_ScalaCamp/Introduction_to_Slick_2.1_and_2.2.pdf A big difference with Slick's approach is that they return rows as tuples whereas sqltyped returns rows as records. The former loses column names and that's information which is sometimes nice to have when Cheers! |
Hi jonifreeman, Im playing around with Slick 3.0, averagely its looks good my only challenge is writing join statements of 3 or more tables, it becomes ugly and difficult. My thoughts was to look for a scala sql library that is good at plain queries(that returns rows as records) for queries that I find complex in slick |
Hi All, is sqltyped still actively maintained ?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: