Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EGA modes fail on real EGA card #37

Open
keenmaster486 opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

EGA modes fail on real EGA card #37

keenmaster486 opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@keenmaster486
Copy link

Title says it all. 640x200x16 and 640x350x16 modes both result in a black screen with a scrollbar and mouse cursor that you cannot do anything with. 640x350 monochrome bizarrely results in a scanrate my monitor cannot display.

Machine:
IBM 5170 PC/AT
IBM EGA with memory expansion (256KB total)
IBM 5154 Enhanced Color Display
640K RAM + 1.5MB EMS
3Com 3C509
MS-DOS 5.0

Microweb 0.53 works fine in EGA 640x350 mode. No 640x200x16 mode to try on that version.

Games that use 320x200x16 EGA modes work fine.

CGA modes still work fine.

As an aside, it would also be nice to be able to run Microweb in 320x200x16 EGA.

@jhhoward
Copy link
Owner

I made some fixes for EGA hardware but they haven't rolled into a release yet. I'll follow this up when I put up a new release to see if it tackles the issues.

@freakedenough
Copy link

freakedenough commented Aug 25, 2024

I can confirm, that I ran into the same issue with my EGA laptop and MW 2.0. Modes e, f, g display this (with different resolution):
20240825_100805

CGA works, also o for Amstrad. However, Amstrad has incorrect colors for UI elements (buttons)
20240825_10133520240825_10161520240825_101619

And this laptop also comes with a 640x400x16 mode. There is a gra400.com to switch the command line to this resolution.
https://archive.org/details/rein_20240824

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants