Feature Request: Parity with pipeline implementation

[deathlyrage]

Things like the newly added notes field and attaching logs, displaying changesets dont work for the pipeline implementation. It would be amazing if we could get the pipeline version to the same feature level as the standard implementation.

Thanks keep up the good work!

[KocproZ]

The notes field is already working in the pipeline (see #10).
As for the log attachment I am not sure how that should look like.
I was considering 2 options:

1. Add a field attachLogs: true and than send logs like in freestyle project,
2. Add a field attachFile: somFileName.log and send specified file.

While the first option would be easier for users, the second one would be more flexible as user could attach any file they want.
Let me know what you think.

[deathlyrage]

I would personally prefer the first one as i wouldn't need to do all the necessary work to capture all the logs to a file, however it might make sense adding in both.

What about "changes" support, such as displaying the changes. Is there a easy way of doing this via pipeline script? Because the native plugin seems to handle it much better.

[KocproZ]

There is a way to display changes in the pipeline, but it requires some knowledge about groovy and accessing current build (example).

[raphaelsamyknewin]

The log feature trough pipeline would be awesome