Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate what the appropriate process might be (RFC?) for standardization #3

Open
tap opened this issue Jun 12, 2013 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@tap
Copy link
Member

tap commented Jun 12, 2013

When this topic was originally breached (during the June workshop in Albi when we worked on Jamoma 0.5) Dave suggested that it should go through the RFC process. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_Comments

Whether this is appropriate for OSNIP or not I am uncertain, but perhaps it should be investigated?

@bltzr
Copy link
Member

bltzr commented Jun 13, 2013

I think it would be a good idea at least to try.
Maybe we could collaboratively redact basic specs and a RFC call e.g. on google docs, that WE could later send to the OSC, SC, Max, PD etc... lists...
What do you guys think ?

@eirikblekesaune
Copy link

I'm in favor of doing so. We should maybe add a milestone for this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants