Compile issue on gfortran 10.x

[jagot]

While compiling with gfortran 10.2.0, I got the following error:

[ 83%] Building Fortran object dbsr/DBSR_CONF3/CMakeFiles/dbsr_conf3.dir/gen_conf.f90.o
/Users/jagot/prog/bsr/src/dbsr/DBSR_CONF3/gen_conf.f90:132:51:

  132 |         if(Jintra(no).eq.Jtotal) Call Check_cfg(ii)
      |                                                   1
Error: More actual than formal arguments in procedure call at (1)
make[2]: *** [dbsr/DBSR_CONF3/CMakeFiles/dbsr_conf3.dir/gen_conf.f90.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [dbsr/DBSR_CONF3/CMakeFiles/dbsr_conf3.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2

If I instead force the gfortran version by FC=gfortran-9 cmake && make, the error disappears. I think this is related to a general tightening of previously lax error handling in gfortran, similar to what we see in Grasp.

@katrham20 Have you seen this? Forcing the gfortran version to 9 of course helps in the short run, but I guess we really want to make the code standards-compliant in the long run.

[katrham20]

Hi Stefanos, Oh I had not seen this - I had mostly been working on tidying up things with the Intel compiler but have not looked at this in a while. Will keep this in mind! On 19 Oct 2020, at 02:29, Stefanos Carlström <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This message is from an external sender. Please take care when responding, clicking links or opening attachments. While compiling with gfortran 10.2.0, I got the following error: [ 83%] Building Fortran object dbsr/DBSR_CONF3/CMakeFiles/dbsr_conf3.dir/gen_conf.f90.o /Users/jagot/prog/bsr/src/dbsr/DBSR_CONF3/gen_conf.f90:132:51: 132 | if(Jintra(no).eq.Jtotal) Call Check_cfg(ii) | 1 Error: More actual than formal arguments in procedure call at (1) make[2]: *** [dbsr/DBSR_CONF3/CMakeFiles/dbsr_conf3.dir/gen_conf.f90.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [dbsr/DBSR_CONF3/CMakeFiles/dbsr_conf3.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 If I instead force the gfortran version by FC=gfortran-9 cmake && make, the error disappears. I think this is related to a general tightening of previously lax error handling in gfortran, similar to what we see in Grasp<compas/grasp#46>. @katrham20<https://github.com/katrham20> Have you seen this? Forcing the gfortran version to 9 of course helps in the short run, but I guess we really want to make the code standards-compliant in the long run. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#4>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD4M7YKK5PK2HUHQX75BXXLSLPTGPANCNFSM4SVYAVSA>.

[jagot]

Fixed in 8df7b60 (cf zatsaroi/DBSR3@b9d417a).