You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: 08-Structural-Equation-Modeling.Rmd
+93Lines changed: 93 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -537,6 +537,99 @@ Thus, [formative constructs](#formativeConstruct) are challenging to use in a SE
537
537
To estimate a [formative construct](#formativeConstruct) in a SEM framework, the [formative construct](#formativeConstruct) must be used in the context of a model that allows some constraints.\index{construct!formative}\index{structural equation modeling!model identification}\index{structural equation modeling!degrees of freedom}
538
538
However, emerging techniques such as confirmatory composite analysis allow estimation of [formative](#formativeConstruct) latent factors [@Schuberth2023; @Yu2023].\index{construct!formative}\index{confirmatory composite analysis}
539
539
540
+
Below is an example using confirmatory composite analysis (adapted from: https://confirmatorycompositeanalysis.com/tutorials-lavaan; archived at: https://perma.cc/7LSU-PTZR):
541
+
542
+
```{r}
543
+
formativeModel3_syntax <- '
544
+
# Specification of the reflective latent factor
545
+
reflective =~ y1 + y2 + y3 + y4
546
+
547
+
# Specification of the associations between the observed variables v1 - v4
548
+
# and the emergent variable "formative" in terms of composite loadings.
0 commit comments