You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: 04-Constructs.Rmd
+3-2Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Linear composite approaches are likely more defensible for [formative constructs
119
119
120
120
To estimate a [reflective construct](#reflectiveConstruct), a latent variable modeling approach is necessary, such as [structural equation modeling](#sem), [factor analysis](#factorAnalysis), or [item response theory](#irt).\index{construct!reflective}\index{latent variable}\index{structural equation modeling}\index{factor analysis}\index{item response theory}
121
121
122
-
To estimate a [formative construct](#formativeConstruct), one may estimate an average or sum score across items (which gives each item equal weight), estimate a weighted average, use [principal component analysis](#pca), or use [structural equation modeling](#sem).\index{construct!formative}\index{linear composite}\index{structural equation modeling}\index{principal component analysis}
122
+
To estimate a [formative construct](#formativeConstruct), one may estimate an average or sum score across items (which gives each item equal weight), estimate a weighted average, use [principal component analysis](#pca), use confirmatory composite analysis, or use [structural equation modeling](#sem).\index{construct!formative}\index{linear composite}\index{structural equation modeling}\index{principal component analysis}\index{confirmatory composite analysis}
123
123
124
124
Thus, it is important to think about the nature of the construct before deciding how to estimate it.\index{construct}
125
125
The nature of a construct is a theoretical question.\index{construct}
@@ -130,8 +130,9 @@ In sum, although empiricism is relevant, theory is necessary to inform our under
130
130
131
131
## Latent Variable Modeling: IRT, SEM, and CFA {#latentVariableModeling}
132
132
133
-
[Item response theory](#irt) (IRT), [structural equation modeling](#sem) (SEM), and [confirmatory factor analysis](#cfa) (CFA) are all approaches to latent variable modeling.\index{latent variable}\index{structural equation modeling}\index{factor analysis}\index{factor analysis!confirmatory}\index{item response theory}
133
+
[Item response theory](#irt) (IRT), [structural equation modeling](#sem) (SEM), confirmatory composite analysis (CCA), and [confirmatory factor analysis](#cfa) (CFA) are all approaches to latent variable modeling.\index{latent variable}\index{structural equation modeling}\index{factor analysis}\index{factor analysis!confirmatory}\index{item response theory}\index{confirmatory composite analysis}
134
134
[CFA](#cfa) and [IRT](#irt) most commonly estimate [reflective](#reflectiveConstruct) latent variables rather than [formative](#formativeConstruct) latent variables.\index{construct!reflective}\index{construct!formative}\index{latent variable}\index{factor analysis!confirmatory}\index{item response theory}
135
+
CCA estimates [formative](#formativeConstruct) latent variables.\index{construct!formative}\index{latent variable}\index{confirmatory composite analysis}
135
136
[SEM](#sem) can estimate both [reflective](#reflectiveConstruct) and [formative](#formativeConstruct) latent variables.\index{construct!reflective}\index{construct!formative}\index{latent variable}\index{structural equation modeling}
136
137
[IRT](#irt) is essentially a form of [CFA](#cfa) with [categorical](#nominalData), binary, or [ordinal](#ordinalData) data.\index{latent variable}\index{factor analysis!confirmatory}\index{item response theory}
137
138
As we discuss in Chapter \@ref(sem), [SEM](#sem) is [CFA](#cfa) with regression paths that specify hypothesized causal relations between the latent variables (the structural component of the model).\index{latent variable}\index{structural equation modeling}\index{factor analysis!confirmatory}
Thus, [formative constructs](#formativeConstruct) are challenging to use in a SEM framework.\index{construct!formative}\index{structural equation modeling!model identification}
359
359
To estimate a [formative construct](#formativeConstruct) in a SEM framework, the [formative construct](#formativeConstruct) must be used in the context of a model that allows some constraints.\index{construct!formative}\index{structural equation modeling!model identification}\index{structural equation modeling!degrees of freedom}
360
+
However, emerging techniques such as confirmatory composite analysis allow estimation of [formative](#formativeConstruct) latent factors [@Schuberth2023; @Yu2023].\index{construct!formative}\index{confirmatory composite analysis}
0 commit comments