Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reintegrate aspects from "uspto-peds-python" fork #9

Open
amotl opened this issue Mar 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Reintegrate aspects from "uspto-peds-python" fork #9

amotl opened this issue Mar 15, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@amotl
Copy link
Member

amotl commented Mar 15, 2019

Coming from #7, @rahul-gj created a fork of this library called uspto-peds-python, which just wraps the PEDS Search API and is purely based on the requests and BeautifulSoup packages.

This variant is obviously able to operate with a trimmed down subset of dependencies making it apparently more usable for specific use cases. However, the same thing could be achieved using extras_require() mechanisms.

This issue has been created to track the reintegration of both variants with each other again.

Thanks for your valuable input on that, Rahul.

@amotl amotl changed the title Reintegrate "uspto-peds-python" variant Reintegrate aspects from "uspto-peds-python" fork Mar 15, 2019
@rahul-gj
Copy link

I don't understand this re-integration thing as I am new to this. If it requires my action please help me with that.

@amotl
Copy link
Member Author

amotl commented Mar 15, 2019

No worries Rahul, it's just a note-to-self that I might come back to this to make the uspto-opendata-python module universal enough that it would solve your basic needs as well as currently outlined by your uspto-peds-python fork. So, we don't have to maintain the common subset of the relevant code at two places.

There's no direct action required by you. Have a good weekend and thanks again!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants