Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 3, 2023. It is now read-only.

"python-imaging-1.1.7-r5 do_package_qa" build problem #81

Open
mindThomas opened this issue Apr 6, 2017 · 10 comments
Open

"python-imaging-1.1.7-r5 do_package_qa" build problem #81

mindThomas opened this issue Apr 6, 2017 · 10 comments

Comments

@mindThomas
Copy link

Fresh pull of repo yields Python-imaging build errors. Any clue?

ERROR: python-imaging-1.1.7-r5 do_package_qa: QA Issue: python-imaging: The compile log indicates that host include and/or library paths were used.
         Please check the log '/home/thomas/intel_aero/poky/build/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/python-imaging/1.1.7-r5/temp/log.do_compile' for more information. [compile-host-path]
ERROR: python-imaging-1.1.7-r5 do_package_qa: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them.
ERROR: python-imaging-1.1.7-r5 do_package_qa: Function failed: do_package_qa
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /home/thomas/intel_aero/poky/build/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/python-imaging/1.1.7-r5/temp/log.do_package_qa.4200
ERROR: Task 6475 (/home/thomas/intel_aero/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-imaging_1.1.7.bb, do_package_qa) failed with exit code '1'
@icoderaven
Copy link

I mentioned this on my forum post. I manually added the patch at
ros/meta-ros#395

@lucasdemarchi
Copy link
Collaborator

I've never seen this build error. And Jenkins as well as our internal build servers are running Ubuntu 16.04.

@icoderaven
Copy link

I got this on 14.04 on a clean build.

@mindThomas
Copy link
Author

Anything special/new that needs to be installed which has not been updated accordingly in the Getting Started guide?
We have now tried in both Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04 with similar outcome

@mindThomas
Copy link
Author

mindThomas commented Apr 10, 2017

@icoderaven But "python-imaging_1.1.7.bb", which uses this patch, has been dropped in the latest meta-ros repo (see ros/meta-ros#395 (comment))
I am currently trying to use the full python recipe folder from your reposity as a replacement (https://github.com/Minipada/meta-ros/tree/9e1a5a452d7d75fce81850a4fc3913751e0d712d/recipes-devtools/python)

Update: This worked, and I am now able to build.
But using the default manifest (from current repository) does not work!

@mindThomas
Copy link
Author

OBS. Trying to build today with the master manifest this problem appears again.
The problem was solved by putting in the python-imaging recipe into meta-ros and by applying the patches as found here: https://github.com/Minipada/meta-ros/tree/9e1a5a452d7d75fce81850a4fc3913751e0d712d/recipes-devtools/python/python-imaging

@icoderaven
Copy link

icoderaven commented Apr 26, 2017

Yeah, likewise. Pulled a fresh new manifest with all the right options -m v1.3.1.xml -b refs/tags/v1.3.1

@lucasdemarchi Could it be because we're explicitly including the opencv whitelist, whereas by default your build servers don't enable the commercial whitelist option
LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST = "commercial"
in your local.conf?

@jaronski
Copy link

Hi there, i am new to yocto and i am having lots of trouble building meta-ros. I get the same ERROR mentioned above. I don't understand how you solved this error? can someone support me an explain what the steps are to solve this problem?
Thanks

@icoderaven
Copy link

@jaronski I abandoned the yocto build a long time back ever since I realized the ubuntu kernel worked with the realsenses. Unless it's absolutely necessary for you to use yocto, I'd recommend switching over to that.

@jaronski
Copy link

@icoderaven thanks for your reply. Unfortunately i have to use Yocto and meta-ros for an industry stereocam system. The System is based on a jetson tx2. The yocto linux is working fine without meta-ros as soon as i put the packagroup-ros-comm into the build i get the error. i changed the meta-ros to the one Minipada supplied without any success. i tried to add the patch manually without any success. Did someone actually solved the error?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants