-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some minor suggestions #2
Comments
Hi Jason, thanks for the issues. Most have been corrected. I'm not sure what e.g. p98 is referring to in your suggestion 5 though. Can you clarify? WRT 7: the conclusions at the end of the day were generally in consensus for 5.1-5.3. I think you're stating there isn't enough indication that this is the case and needs to be better called out? |
I'm not sure what e.g. p98 is referring to in your suggestion 5 though. Can you clarify?
What I referred to what the discussion folks had that latency data is not normally distributed, so using a mean or median is not informative. Rather, in these multi-modal datasets it is better to look at the 98th (p98) or 99th percentile (p99). Hope that helps!
From: Wes Hardaker ***@***.***>
Reply-To: intarchboard/network-quality-workshop-report ***@***.***>
Date: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 17:01
To: intarchboard/network-quality-workshop-report ***@***.***>
Cc: "Livingood, Jason" ***@***.***>, Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [intarchboard/network-quality-workshop-report] Some minor suggestions (Issue #2)
Hi Jason, thanks for the issues. Most have been corrected.
I'm not sure what e.g. p98 is referring to in your suggestion 5 though. Can you clarify?
WRT 7: the conclusions at the end of the day were generally in consensus for 5.1-5.3. I think you're stating there isn't enough indication that this is the case and needs to be better called out?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/intarchboard/network-quality-workshop-report/issues/2*issuecomment-978307352__;Iw!!CQl3mcHX2A!WncgNuCkIb5DL3dWWAkbnqdVLtYoq2MUsaYBw96V5WHrxn2BRE3Ufvp8JQtDrnI0ktXpaxkR$>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACERSHONQOVEEIFGAKKGFSLUNVODRANCNFSM5H23GANA__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!WncgNuCkIb5DL3dWWAkbnqdVLtYoq2MUsaYBw96V5WHrxn2BRE3Ufvp8JQtDrnI0kveeEzVh$>.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!WncgNuCkIb5DL3dWWAkbnqdVLtYoq2MUsaYBw96V5WHrxn2BRE3Ufvp8JQtDrnI0kioWQUm7$> or Android<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign*3Dnotification-email*26utm_medium*3Demail*26utm_source*3Dgithub__;JSUlJSU!!CQl3mcHX2A!WncgNuCkIb5DL3dWWAkbnqdVLtYoq2MUsaYBw96V5WHrxn2BRE3Ufvp8JQtDrnI0ksfGaMCL$>.
|
Ok, that makes perfect sense (and was a definite "oh duh" moment). Anyway, I think I'll leave out the example though as the point of the bullet is not to indicate what the better metric actually is (because there may be a debate over that, or more importantly: the point of the workshop is that we may not even know what the future best is). |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: