Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/workflow outputs for archives #114

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

Biont
Copy link
Member

@Biont Biont commented Mar 12, 2024

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)
  • Docs have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Feature

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
I had previously assumed that writing to the job output would mean that calling workflows can consume the archive name for further handling (->downloading/extracting it again to make further changes).

However, I overlooked that for this to work, you must also define workflow_call.outputs

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
workflow_call.outputs are now defined to pass on the job output to the outside world.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:

Copy link
Member

@tyrann0us tyrann0us left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding this! LGTM.

.github/workflows/build-plugin-archive.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@Chrico
Copy link
Member

Chrico commented Mar 19, 2024

Relates to #98

@tyrann0us tyrann0us merged commit 6b77794 into main Mar 19, 2024
@tyrann0us tyrann0us deleted the feature/workflow-outputs-for-archives branch March 19, 2024 09:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants