You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
# rust toolchain version
rustup 1.26.0 (5af9b9484 2023-04-05)
info: This is the version for the rustup toolchain manager, not the rustc compiler.
info: The currently active `rustc` version is `rustc 1.73.0 (cc66ad468 2023-10-03)`# genevo version from our Cargo.toml
genevo = "0.7.1"
Specifically referring to the section using or and and inside the until(...). Basically the "sub-OR" was originally the only combinator. We have a section of code where we are using FFI to call into some shared object files to solve complex circuit models (OpenDSS). Inside our fitness function implementation is where we are setting up, exercising, and solving the circuit via the FFI and evaluating the fitness score of the calculations.
Due to this legacy-style setup, I was hoping to use the example I provided here to do either the original combinator (like what's shown in some of the examples), OR if we return the worst possible fitness score AND have 3 generations, then the algorithm simulation would know to stop. FWIW in all of the simulation runs we've done, we have never gotten closer than 90 points to the worst possible score.
Am I misunderstanding or using this incorrectly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Our simulation setup:
Specifically referring to the section using
or
andand
inside theuntil(...)
. Basically the "sub-OR" was originally the only combinator. We have a section of code where we are usingFFI
to call into some shared object files to solve complex circuit models (OpenDSS). Inside our fitness function implementation is where we are setting up, exercising, and solving the circuit via theFFI
and evaluating the fitness score of the calculations.Due to this legacy-style setup, I was hoping to use the example I provided here to do either the original combinator (like what's shown in some of the examples), OR if we return the worst possible fitness score AND have 3 generations, then the algorithm simulation would know to stop. FWIW in all of the simulation runs we've done, we have never gotten closer than 90 points to the worst possible score.
Am I misunderstanding or using this incorrectly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: