Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Markdown formatting errors #40

Open
RookieGordon opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Markdown formatting errors #40

RookieGordon opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
parsing issue Problems related to Readability or Obsidian's Turndown implementation

Comments

@RookieGordon
Copy link

Parts of the file downloaded locally are formatted differently than the web page. For example, some of the code snippets in cnblogs are not recognized correctly.
2024521-173812

@inhumantsar
Copy link
Owner

can you share the URL for that page?

@RookieGordon
Copy link
Author

can you share the URL for that page?

https://www.cnblogs.com/unity2018/p/8492463.html

@inhumantsar
Copy link
Owner

thanks! if it's getting lost when the page is simplified, it should be a straightforward fix. it might not be feasible to fix if it's getting lost when converting to markdown though, since slurp depends on obsidian to handle that.

i'll see if i can find what's causing the issue.

@RookieGordon
Copy link
Author

thanks! if it's getting lost when the page is simplified, it should be a straightforward fix. it might not be feasible to fix if it's getting lost when converting to markdown though, since slurp depends on obsidian to handle that.

i'll see if i can find what's causing the issue.

ok,I'll wait for good news.

@inhumantsar inhumantsar added the parsing issue Problems related to Readability or Obsidian's Turndown implementation label May 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
parsing issue Problems related to Readability or Obsidian's Turndown implementation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants