You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This will be merged soon, and so I can help to start a PR defining the struct, so long as the type is defined with a ?draft URI for now. (Or we can wait to merge it).
One item to consider here that I've always wondered is should we be using generated Go code against the protobuf message defining the predicate? This would mean that the oneof support comes out of the box. On the other hand, there's some overhead of bringing in the proto runtime dependencies and complexity.
The oneof could also be handled by an interface, but this is also a little bit of overhead.
Description of the feature request:
Support v1.0 SLSA provenance, as defined in a draft here: slsa-framework/slsa#525
This will be merged soon, and so I can help to start a PR defining the struct, so long as the type is defined with a
?draft
URI for now. (Or we can wait to merge it).One item to consider here that I've always wondered is should we be using generated Go code against the protobuf message defining the predicate? This would mean that the oneof support comes out of the box. On the other hand, there's some overhead of bringing in the proto runtime dependencies and complexity.
The oneof could also be handled by an interface, but this is also a little bit of overhead.
cc @MarkLodato @rbehjati @laurentsimon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: