-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
mainintro.tex
1432 lines (1313 loc) · 57.6 KB
/
mainintro.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% mainintro.tex - Ian Huston
%
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% =========================================================== %
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
\chapter{Inflationary Cosmology}
\label{ch:introduction}
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% =========================================================== %
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
In this chapter the foundations of inflationary cosmology are described.
%
In Section~\ref{sec:frw-intro} the
physics of
an isotropic and homogeneous universe is reviewed. The inflationary
scenario is introduced in Section~\ref{sec:inflation-intro}.
First order cosmological perturbation theory is presented in
Section~\ref{sec:perts-intro} and inflationary models with non-canonical actions are
described in Section~\ref{sec:noncanoninfl}.
The current observational limits on inflationary models are outlined in
Section~\ref{sec:obs-intro} and departures from
Gaussian statistics are parametrised in Section~\ref{sec:fnl-intro}.
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% =========================================================== %
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
\section{The Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Universe}
\label{sec:frw-intro}
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% =========================================================== %
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
The cosmological principle is central to the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker
(FRW\footnotemark) Universe.
\footnotetext{Lema\^{i}tre is sometimes also included in this group to give
FLRW.}
According to this postulate, there is no privileged
place in the universe and no privileged direction in which to make observations.
These assertions
are formalised by assuming that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic at
every point. This clearly conflicts with the highly inhomogeneous nature of matter
on planetary and solar system scales, but is assumed to hold as larger and larger
scales are considered.
Surveys of the observable universe indicate that this assumption is valid up to
the largest
scales observed \cite{Colless:2001gk, York:2000gk}.
Historically, homogeneity and isotropy were assumed primarily for simplicity.
Many alternative approaches can be taken. Violating these assumptions can
be done, for example, by specifying a preferred direction or supposing that the
universe is formed by a series of voids connected by filaments. Although many
of these approaches have been disregarded due to lack of evidence, some are still
allowed by observations
\cite{GarciaBellido:2008nz,Alexander:2007xx,Alnes:2005rw,Hunt:2008wp}.
This section outlines the dynamics of the standard Big Bang scenario.
By assuming homogeneity and isotropy, the equations of motion of a
fluid-filled universe can be derived. What follows here is a
standard exposition of well-known physics and has been the subject of
numerous reviews including Refs.~\cite{book:kolbturner, book:kip, book:liddle}.
By imposing both homogeneity and isotropy on a general 4-dimensional metric, the
line element $\d s^2$ of the FRW universe with coordinates $(t,r,\theta,\omega)$
is obtained:
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:frwmetric-intro}
\d s^2 = -\d t^2 + a^2(t)
\left(
\frac{\d r^2}{1-Kr^2} + r^2\left(\d\theta^2 + \sin^2(\theta)
\d\omega^2\right)
\right)\,,
\end{equation}
%
where $K=+1, 0$ or $-1$ depending on whether the universe is closed, flat
or open respectively. The time-like coordinate in the metric is $t$, known as
proper time.
%
The spatial part of the FRW metric is multiplied by the scale factor $a(t)$.
This characterises the size of space-like hypersurfaces at
different times. In an expanding universe, $a$ grows with
increasing $t$ and $\dot{a}>0$.
The definition of the Hubble parameter, $H$, captures this expansion:
% Definition of Hubble parameter
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:Hdefn-intro}
H = \frac{\dot{a}}{a} \,.
\end{equation}
%
The Einstein equations can be derived by the variational principle from the
action $S$, where $S\equiv S_\mathrm{EH} + S_\mathrm{M}$. This is the sum
of the
Einstein-Hilbert ($S_\mathrm{EH}$) and matter ($S_\mathrm{M}$) actions which are
defined as
%
\begin{align}
\label{eq:EHeqn-intro}
S_\mathrm{EH} &= \frac{1}{16\pi G}\int \d^4 x \sqrt{|g|} \left(R +
2\Lambda_c\right) \,,\\
\label{eq:matteraction-intro}
S_\mathrm{M} &= \int \d^4 x \sqrt{|g|}
\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{M} \,.
\end{align}
%
Here $g$ is the determinant of the metric $g_{\mu\nu}$, $R$ is the Ricci
scalar, $G$ is Newton's gravitational constant, $\Lambda_c$ is a cosmological
constant term
and $\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{M}$ is the sum of the Lagrangian densities
for all the matter fields.
Changing either the matter or gravity actions will affect the
resultant physics. In this work we focus our attention only on the matter
Lagrangian and will use the standard Einstein-Hilbert action throughout.
We can now write down the Einstein equations for a general matter Lagrangian:
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:einstein-intro}
R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}R g_{\mu\nu} = 8\pi G T_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda_c
g_{\mu\nu}\,,
\end{equation}
%
where $T_{\mu\nu}$ is the stress energy tensor obtained by the variation of the
matter Lagrangian.
In the definitions above we have included a
cosmological constant term, $\Lambda_c$, for completeness. In the early
universe this term is sub-dominant and will be negligible until much later
\cite{book:liddle}. From now on we will
disregard the contribution of such a term in the early universe.
We concentrate now on the case of a universe filled with a perfect
fluid. Suppose $u^\mu$ is the 4-velocity of this fluid with $u^\mu
u_\mu=-1$. The stress-energy tensor of the fluid is
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:fluidstress-intro}
T^\mu_{~\nu} = (E + P)u^\mu u_\nu + P\delta^\mu_\nu \,,
\end{equation}
%
where $E$ is the matter energy density and $P$ is the isotropic pressure.
The trace of $T$ is given by
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:Ttrace-intro}
T^\mu_{~\mu} = -E + 3P\,.
\end{equation}
%
The Einstein equations and the stress-energy tensor of the
perfect fluid can now be used to derive the equations of motion of the fluid.
From the metric in \eq{eq:frwmetric-intro}, the $00$ and $ij$ components of the
Ricci tensor can be found:
%
\begin{align}
\label{eq:Ricci00-intro}
R_{00} &= -3 \frac{\ddot{a}}{a} \,,\\
\label{eq:Ricciij-intro}
R_{ij} &= \gamma_{ij} \left[ 2\dot{a}^2 +
a \ddot{a} + 2K \right] \,,
\end{align}
%
where $\gamma_{ij}$ is the time independent spatial part of the metric in \eq{eq:frwmetric-intro}.
The Friedmann equations are then determined from the Einstein equations
\eqref{eq:einstein-intro}.
The $00$ equation gives
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:Friedmann1-intro}
H^2 = \left(\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right)^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3} E - \frac{K}{a^2}\,,
\end{equation}
%
while the trace of the Einstein equations gives the Raychaudhuri or
acceleration equation
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:Friedmann2-intro}
\frac{\ddot{a}}{a} = -\frac{4\pi G}{3}(E + 3P)\,.
\end{equation}
%
By combining these two equations we can determine a continuity equation for the
energy density:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:continuity-intro}
\dot{E} + 3H(E+P) = 0 \,.
\end{equation}
The last three equations, \eqref{eq:Friedmann1-intro},
\eqref{eq:Friedmann2-intro}
and \eqref{eq:continuity-intro}, will determine the evolution of the
perfect fluid. Two important solutions of these equations are
the radiation and
matter dominated universes. In the standard Big Bang scenario the universe is
dominated by radiation to a good approximation until matter becomes dominant
at later times \cite{book:kolbturner}. These different components
change the rate of expansion
of the universe. For relativistic radiation $P_\mathrm{rad}=E_\mathrm{rad}/3$
and integrating the continuity equation \eqref{eq:continuity-intro} gives
$E_\mathrm{rad}\propto a^{-4}$. Matter conversely is taken to be dust-like with
zero
pressure and so $E_\mathrm{matter}\propto a^{-3}$. The dependence of $a$ on $t$
can then be
found from \eq{eq:Friedmann1-intro}, giving $a\propto t^{1/2}$ and $a\propto
t^{2/3}$ for the radiation and matter eras respectively.
% Horizons
Instead of using proper time as above we could bring
the scale factor outside the whole metric and use conformal time $\eta$
defined by
% Conformal time
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:etatime-intro}
\eta = \int\frac{\d t}{a}\,.
\end{equation}
%
The metric written in conformal time is then
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:frwconformal-intro}
\d s^2 = a^2(\eta)
\left( -\d\eta^2 +
\frac{\d r^2}{1-Kr^2} + r^2\left(\d\theta^2 + \sin^2(\theta)
\d\omega^2\right)
\right)\,,
\end{equation}
%
As all the coordinates in the line element are now scaled by $a(\eta)$, we
have defined a coordinate grid which does not change as the universe expands.
These ``comoving'' coordinates allow distances to be compared at different
eras with ease. A comoving distance $x$ can be translated into a physical
distance $d$ by
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:comovingdefn-intro}
d = ax \,.
\end{equation}
The physical distance changes as the universe expands but the comoving distance
will remain fixed.
One particularly important distance is the maximum distance light could have
propagated from some initial time $t_i$ to a later time $t$. From
\eq{eq:etalog-intro}, this is simply the conformal time integrated from
the initial time and is called the comoving or particle horizon.
If the initial time is restricted to
being at some finite time in the past, as in the Big Bang scenario, then the
particle horizon will be finite. Two points which are further apart than
this finite distance could never have been in causal contact. This
is the origin of one of the major problems with the standard Big Bang scenario
and will be discussed in the next section.
Rewriting the comoving horizon as
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:etalog-intro}
\eta = \int_{a_i}^a \frac{\d a'}{a'} \frac{1}{a' H(a')} \,,
\end{equation}
shows that it is also the logarithmic integral of the comoving Hubble
radius $1/aH$. This distance is how far particles can travel in one
``e-folding'', the time for $a$ to expand by one exponential factor.
The number of e-foldings between two measurements of the scale factor, $a_i$
and $a_f$, is given by
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:nefolddefn-intro}
\N = \ln \frac{a_f}{a_i}\,.
\end{equation}
Particles
that are separated by more than the Hubble radius cannot be in causal
contact now. Particles separated by more than the
comoving horizon, however, could never have been in causal contact. In addition
to the Hubble parameter $H$, it will be useful
to define the parameter $\H = aH = a'/a$. The comoving Hubble radius is then
$1/\H$.
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% =========================================================== %
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
\section{Inflation}
\label{sec:inflation-intro}
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% =========================================================== %
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
In this section we introduce the inflationary scenario. First we briefly
describe how it solves two major problems with the standard Big Bang
picture: the flatness problem and the horizon problem \cite{book:liddle}. We go on to
describe canonical slow roll inflation, the generation of
perturbations from quantum fluctuations and inflation from non-canonical
actions.
\subsection{Problems with the Big Bang Scenario}
Although remarkably successful in describing the evolution of the universe from
very early in its history, the standard Big Bang scenario suffers from a number
of serious problems. Two of the main problems are described in this section.
\subsubsection{Flatness Problem}
\label{sec:flatprob}
The Friedmann equation
\eqref{eq:Friedmann1-intro} can be re-written as
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:omegadefn-intro}
\Omega(t) - 1 = \frac{K}{(aH)^2} = \frac{K}{\dot{a}^2} \,,
\end{equation}
%
where $\Omega(t)=E(t)/E_\mathrm{crit}$ and the critical density
$E_\mathrm{crit}= 3H^2/8\pi G$.
If $\ddot{a}>0$ then $\Omega$ approaches the critical value $\Omega=1$ over time,
whereas if
$\ddot{a}<0$ it diverges from this value. The flat universe, $K=0$,
is an unstable fixed point in the parameter space.
Current observations confirm that $\Omega=1$ within about 2\%, at a 95\% confidence
level \cite{Komatsu:2008hk}.
During the radiation and matter dominated eras $aH$ is decreasing with time,
so that $\Omega$ diverges away from 1. If the measured value is now very
close to 1 then in the past it must have been even closer.
The fine-tuning in the initial conditions required for this proximity to $\Omega=1$
is known as the flatness problem.
\subsubsection{Horizon Problem} \label{sec:horizprob}
The particle horizon, also known
as the comoving horizon, defines the maximum separation between two points that
have been in causal contact sometime in the past. During the radiation and
matter eras, this comoving horizon increases monotonically and so length scales
which are now entering the horizon would have been far outside it in
the past.
The CMB as observed by the WMAP satellite is extremely smooth on scales that
would have been far outside the horizon at the time of last scattering
\cite{Komatsu:2008hk}. These regions of space have very similar energies and
yet according to the Big Bang scenario they could never have been in causal contact.
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% =========================================================== %
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
\subsection{Inflation and Canonical Slow Roll}
\label{sec:slowroll-intro}
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% =========================================================== %
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
Inflation is a period of accelerated expansion in the size of the universe
which took place just after the Big Bang
\cite{Starobinsky:1980te,Guth:1980zm,Albrecht:1982wi,Linde:1981mu,
Starobinsky:1982ee}. During this
expansion phase the comoving Hubble radius $(aH)^{-1}$ decreases and the isotropic
pressure of the universe is negative \cite{book:liddle, Baumann2009}:
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:infldefn-intro}
\frac{\d }{\d t}\left( \frac{1}{aH}\right) <0
\quad \Rightarrow \quad
\ddot{a}>0
\quad \Rightarrow \quad
E + 3P < 0 \,.
\end{equation}
%
We can define a new parameter
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:epsilonHdefn-intro}
\varepsilon_H = -\frac{\dot{H}}{H^2}\,,
\end{equation}
%
and then rewrite
the Raychaudhuri equation \eqref{eq:Friedmann2-intro} as
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:Friedeps-intro}
\frac{\ddot{a}}{a} = H^2 (1-\varepsilon_H)\,.
\end{equation}
%
This parametrisation illustrates that inflation only occurs when $\varepsilon_H<1$.
In this subsection we describe briefly how inflation solves the problems
outlined above and outline the inflationary dynamics of single scalar field
models.
Both the horizon and flatness problems described above are statements about our
reluctance to impose fine-tuned initial conditions. Inflation removes the need
to fix these conditions at the start of the Big Bang.
A period of decreasing Hubble radius before the radiation period could explain the
homogeneity of temperatures in the CMB at large scales.
Comoving scales that entered the horizon recently, such as
those we observe in the CMB, would have been within the horizon previously.
During this period, the energy density could reach an equilibrium
value.
Figure~\ref{fig:comovingscales-intro} shows how, by extending
the era of inflation far enough into the past, any comoving length could
previously have been inside the horizon.
Observations require that inflation lasted at least long enough that all the
scales we measure today were previously inside the horizon.
%
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{graphs/scales.pdf}
\caption[Comoving Scales and the Hubble Radius]{Comoving scales that have recently
entered the horizon would
previously have been inside the horizon, if the inflationary period extended far
enough into the past.}
\label{fig:comovingscales-intro}
\end{figure}
%
Now consider the time derivative of $|\Omega -1|$ as defined in
\eq{eq:omegadefn-intro}:
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:omegaderiv-intro}
\frac{\d}{\d t}\left(|\Omega -1 |\right) = 3\frac{\d}{\d t}
\left(\frac{1}{aH}\right)\,.
\end{equation}
%
If the universe is not flat to begin with, a period of inflation of sufficient
duration will push it
towards $\Omega=1$, solving the flatness problem. Instead of an unstable point
in the parameter space, $\Omega=1$ is an attractor during the inflationary
phase.
%
To solve the horizon and flatness problems the duration of the inflationary era
must be
sufficiently long. Approximately $50$--$70$ e-foldings is considered standard
\cite{book:liddle}. Inflation
can last longer than this but only the last 50--70 e-foldings will be important
for the length scales of our observable universe.
During inflation the universe is filled by material exhibiting negative isotropic
pressure.
Therefore, whatever drives inflation cannot be matter or radiation in their usual
forms. The simplest proposal is to fill the universe with a single scalar field
$\varphi$. The canonical action for this field is
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:phiaction-intro}
\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{M} \equiv P(\varphi, X) = X -V(\varphi) \,,
\end{equation}
where $X=-\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\partial^\mu\varphi \partial^\nu\varphi$ denotes
the kinetic energy of $\varphi$, $V(\vp)$ is the potential and $P(\varphi, X)$
is called the kinetic
function. In Section~\ref{sec:noncanoninfl} we will consider other
choices for $P$.
The equation of motion for $\varphi$, for the canonical action $P=X-V$, is
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:phieom1-intro}
\ddot{\vp} + 3H\dot{\vp} -\nabla^2 \vp + \frac{\delta V}{\delta \vp} = 0\,.
\end{equation}
%
If we now restrict ourselves to considering the homogeneous part of the field,
$\vp=\vp(t)$, the $\nabla^2\vp$ term disappears and the functional derivative
of $V$ becomes a standard derivative $V_{,\vp}$.
% A subscripted comma will
% denote partial differentiation, $V_{,\vp}=\partial V/\partial\vp$.
With these choices we have the following relations for the matter
energy-density and isotropic pressure:
%
\begin{align}
\label{eq:EandP-intro}
E &= \frac{1}{2}\dot{\varphi}^2 + V(\varphi) \,,\\
\label{eq:Pdefn-intro}
P &= \frac{1}{2}\dot{\varphi}^2 - V(\varphi) \,.
\end{align}
%
Under these conditions the kinetic function $P(\varphi, X)$ can be identified as
the isotropic pressure. The dynamics of the field are governed by the potential
$V(\varphi)$. Inflation requires $P<-E/3$, so from Eqs.~\eqref{eq:EandP-intro} and
\eqref{eq:Pdefn-intro} inflation
can also be thought of as a period when the potential energy dominates over
the kinetic energy.
Inflation needs to last long enough to solve the problems described above. A generic
potential is not likely to satisfy these requirements without fine-tuning. One
approach is to enforce conditions on the potential under which the inflationary
period is necessarily long.
%
We have seen that for
inflation to occur the potential needs to dominate over the kinetic energy. From
\eq{eq:EandP-intro}, this occurs in the limit $P\rightarrow -E$ or equivalently
$\varepsilon_H \ll 1$. However, for this to remain the case for a sufficiently long
period the second derivative of $\vp$ must be small. If we define
another parameter
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:etaHdefn-intro}
\eta_H \equiv -\frac{\d \ln \dot{\vp}}{\d \ln a} =
-\frac{\ddot{\vp}}{H\dot{\vp}}
=\varepsilon_H -\frac{\dot{\varepsilon_H}}{2H\varepsilon_H}\,,
\end{equation}
%
then taking $|\eta_H|\ll 1$ ensures that $\dot{\vp}$ and $\varepsilon_H$
change slowly. This allows an inflationary phase of sufficient duration to occur.
The approximations $\varepsilon_H\ll 1$ and $|\eta|\ll 1$ are known as the
slow roll conditions because they force the inflaton field $\vp$ to roll down
the potential $V$ slowly. The parameters $\varepsilon_H$ and $\eta_H$ are the
slow roll parameters. Setting $\ddot{\vp}$ to be small is equivalent to
making the friction $H\dot{\vp}$ in \eq{eq:phieom1-intro} dominant. With
these approximations the
equations of motion for a slowly rolling field become
%
\begin{align}
\dot{\vp} &\simeq - \frac{V_{,\vp}}{3H}\,, \\
H^2 &\simeq \frac{8\pi G}{3}V(\vp)\,.
\end{align}
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% =========================================================== %
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
\section{Perturbations}
\label{sec:perts-intro}
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
% =========================================================== %
% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
We considered a homogeneous scalar field in the analysis of
Section~\ref{sec:inflation-intro}. Such a field, however, will
lead only to a homogeneous universe later. How does the myriad structure
that we see around us form? From stars to galaxies to clusters, the
gravitational force has concentrated energy density over the history of the
universe, but some initial fluctuation must have been present to begin this
process. One of the main achievements of inflation is to provide a physical
origin for
such initial fluctuations. In Chapter~\ref{ch:perts} we will formally develop
cosmological perturbation theory up to second order. In this section we
review first order perturbation theory and introduce the observable quantities
important for inflation.
Suppose that a full inhomogeneous scalar field
$\varphi$ is split into a homogeneous background field $\vp_0$, as described
above, and an inhomogeneous perturbation $\dvp{}(\eta,x^i)$ for $i=1,2,3$. For the
following
analysis to be applicable the perturbation must be much smaller than the background
field value. From the amplitude of perturbations in the CMB this approximation
can be seen to be valid \cite{Komatsu:2008hk}. For single field models no mixing
of adiabatic and non-adiabatic modes occurs \cite{Weinberg200804}. Therefore, throughout this
thesis we will only consider adiabatic perturbations and ignore any isocurvature mode present.
If we suppose that $\epsilon$ is a small quantity then the split in $\vp$
can be written as \cite{Malik:2008im}
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:pertsplit-intro}
\vp(\eta, x^i) = \vp_0(\eta) + \epsilon\dvp{}(\eta, x^i) \,.
\end{equation}
%
The perturbation $\dvp{}(\eta, x^i)$ can be further expanded in
powers of $\epsilon$. We will follow the
custom of not explicitly writing $\epsilon$, instead relying on the order of
the perturbation, denoted by a subscript, to keep track.
If we expand in a Taylor series then up to second order (\ie including terms
up to $\epsilon^2$) we have:
%
\begin{equation}
\vp(\eta, x^i) = \vp_0(\eta) + \dvp1(\eta, x^i) + \frac{1}{2}\dvp2(\eta, x^i)
\,.
\end{equation}
%
There is some freedom in how the split of the perturbations into different
orders is made. We will suppose that the first order perturbation $\dvp1$
contains only linear contributions and the higher order terms contain non-linear
terms.
Instead of working in coordinate space, we can also consider
the perturbation in Fourier space using the definition
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:fourierdefn-intro}
\dvp{}(\eta, x^i) = \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^3} \int \d^3k \dvp{}(\kvi) \exp (i k_i
x^i)
\,,
\end{equation}
where $k^i$ are the components of the comoving wavenumber vector $\bf{k}$. The
amplitude of this
vector $k=|\bf{k}|$ identifies whether a particular mode is inside or outside
the comoving horizon. Wavemodes inside the comoving horizon are identified by
$k>aH$, while $k<aH$ for those outside the horizon.
We must also consider perturbations in the metric tensor $g_{\mu\nu}$. If the
background metric is the FRW one described in Section~\ref{sec:frw-intro} then
the metric can be written with perturbations, up to first order, as follows:
%
\begin{align}
\label{eq:pertmetric-intro}
g_{00} &= -a^2 (1 + 2\phi_1) \,, \nonumber\\
g_{0i} &= a^2 B_{1i} \,, \nonumber\\
g_{ij} &= a^2\left(\delta_{ij} + 2C_{1ij} \right) \,.
\end{align}
%
The $0$-$i$ and $i$-$j$ perturbations can be decomposed into scalar, vector and
tensor parts \cite{Malik:2008im}:
\begin{align}
\label{eq:svt-intro}
B_{1i} &= B_{1,i} - S_{1i} \,, \nonumber\\
C_{1ij} &= -\psi_1\delta_{ij} + E_{1,ij} + F_{1(i,j)} + \frac{1}{2}h_{1ij}\,,
\end{align}
%
where $F_{1(i,j)} = \frac{1}{2}(F_{1i,j} + F_{1j,i})$.
%
The vectors $S_{1i}$ and $F_{1i}$ are divergence free and the tensor part
$h_{1ij}$
is divergence free and traceless:
%
\begin{equation}
S^k_{1~,k} = 0\,, \quad F^k_{1~,k}=0\,; \qquad h^{ik}_{1~~,k} = 0\,,
\quad h^k_{1~k}= 0\,.
\end{equation}
%
In the previous equations $\phi$ is the lapse function, $\psi$ is the curvature
perturbation, $B_1$ and $E_1$ are the scalar part of the shear, $S_{1i}$, and
$F_{1i}$
are the vector parts of the shear, and $h_{1ij}$ is the tensor perturbation
describing gravitational waves.
Splitting an inhomogeneous spacetime into background and perturbation is not a
covariant operation. This leads to an ambiguity in the choice of coordinates
which must be rectified by choosing a gauge. Gauge transformations relate
physical results in one gauge to those in another. To choose a gauge one must
specify how spacetime is foliated, \iec a slicing, and how coordinates in one
spatial hypersurface are related to those in another, \iec a threading
\cite{Malik:2008im}. We will
employ the uniform curvature gauge in which spatial hypersurfaces are flat. This
is also known as the flat gauge.
The gauge transformation vector at first order, $\xi_1^\mu$, can be split into
scalar
and vector parts
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:xidefn-intro}
\xi_1^\mu = (\alpha_1, \beta_{1,}^{~i} + \gamma_1^i)\,,
\end{equation}
%
where the vector part obeys $\gamma_{1~,k}^{~k}=0$. A scalar quantity such as
the inflaton perturbation will transform as \cite{Malik:2008im, Malik:2008yp}
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:dphitransform-intro}
\wt{\dvp1} = \dvp1 + \vp_0' \alpha_1\,,
\end{equation}
where a tilde ($\wt{~}$) denotes a transformed quantity. For the metric
perturbations the
transformations for the scalars are
\begin{align}
\label{transphi1}
\widetilde {\phi_1} &= \phi_1 +\H\alpha_1+\alpha_1'\,,\\
%
\label{transpsi1}
\widetilde \psi_1 &= \psi_1-\H\alpha_1 \,,\\
%
\label{transB1}
\widetilde B_1 &= B_1-\alpha_1+\beta_1'\,,\\
%
\label{transE1}
\widetilde E_1 &= E_1+\beta_1\,,
\end{align}
and for the vectors
\begin{align}
\label{transS1}
\widetilde {S_{1}^{~i}} &= S_{1}^{~i}-{\gamma_1^i}'\,, \\
%
\label{transF1}
\widetilde {F_{1}^{~i}} &= F_{1}^{~i}+\gamma_1^i\,.
\end{align}
%
The tensor perturbation $h_{1ij}$ does not change under transformation at first
order, but does at subsequent orders.
The flat gauge, which we will use, is the one in which spatial hypersurfaces
are not perturbed by scalar or vector perturbations, so $\wt{\psi_1} = \wt{E_1}
=0$ and $\wt{F_{1i}} = \textbf{0}$. This is equivalent to the transformation
%
\begin{equation}
\alpha_1 = \frac{\psi_1}{\H}\,,\quad \beta_1=-E_1 \,, \quad \gamma^i_1 =
-F^i_1\,.
\end{equation}
A gauge invariant inflaton perturbation variable is the Sasaki-Mukhanov
variable \cite{Mukhanov:1990me, Mukhanov:1988jd,
Sasaki:1986hm}:
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:flatdvp1-intro}
\wt{\dvp1} \equiv \dvp1 + \vp_0'\frac{\psi_1}{\H}\,,
\end{equation}
%
In the flat gauge this is just $\dvp1$. We will work in flat
gauge from now on and so will drop the tildes on quantities in that gauge.
Another very important gauge invariant quantity is the comoving curvature
perturbation $\R$. At first order in the flat gauge $\R$ is related to the
inflaton perturbation by \cite{Malik:2008im}
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:flatRdefn-intro}
\R = \frac{\H}{\vp_0'}\dvp1\,.
\end{equation}
%
We are interested in the power spectrum of the curvature perturbation as this
is directly related to the temperature fluctuations that we can observe in the
CMB.
The action \eqref{eq:phiaction-intro},
including perturbations of $\vp$ and $g_{\mu\nu}$ up to first order, is
varied to get the equation of motion of $\dvp1$.
In the flat gauge the equation can be rewritten in terms of the inflaton field
values only by eliminating the metric perturbations using
\eq{eq:flatdvp1-intro}.
%
In Fourier space and in terms of the conformal time $\eta$, the closed form of
the first order perturbation equation of motion is \cite{Malik:2008im}
%
\begin{multline}
\label{eq:fokg-intro}
\dvp1''(\kvi) + 2\H \dvp1'(\kvi) + k^2\dvp1(\kvi) \\
+ a^2 \left[\Upp +
\frac{8\pi G}{\H}\left(2\vp_{0}' \Uphi + (\vp_{0}')^2\frac{8\pi G
}{\H}\U\right)\right]\dvp1(\kvi) = 0 \,,
\end{multline}
%
where $\U$ is the background value of the potential $V(\vp)$.
%
Substituting $u=a\dvp1$ gives the Mukhanov equation \cite{Mukhanov:1990me}
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:ueq-intro}
u''(\kvi) + \left[ k^2 -\frac{z''}{z}\right]u(\kvi) = 0\,,
\end{equation}
%
where $z= a\vp_0'/\H$.
\subsection{Quantum Perturbations}
So far we have considered classical perturbations. However, the generation of
fluctuations is a quantum effect and we need to consider the
perturbations as quantum operators in some vacuum.
In Minkowski space the quantisation of $u(\kvi)$ is straightforward.
The perturbation modes can be written in terms of quantum operators as
%
\begin{equation}
u(\kvi)\rightarrow\hat{u}(\kvi) =
w(\kvi) \hat{a}(\kvi) + w^\star(-\kvi)\hat{a}^\dagger(-\kvi) \,.
\end{equation}
%
The mode function $w(\kvi)$ obeys the same equation of motion as $u(\kvi)$:
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:weqn-intro}
w''(\kvi) + \left[ k^2 -\frac{z''}{z}\right]w(\kvi) = 0\,.
\end{equation}
%
The operators $\hat{a}^\dagger$ and $\hat{a}$ are the usual creation and
annihilation operators. They act on quantum states by adding or
removing particles. The zero particle vacuum state, $|0\rangle$, is such that
%
\begin{equation}
\hat{a}^\dagger|0\rangle = |1\rangle\,,\quad \hat{a}|0\rangle = 0\,.
\end{equation}
%
In Minkowski space these operators have the usual commutation relations
%
\begin{equation}
[\hat{a}(\kb), \hat{a}^\dagger(\kb')] = (2\pi)^3 \delta(\kb -\kb') \\
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
[\hat{a}^\dagger(\kb), \hat{a}^\dagger(\kb')] = [\hat{a}(\kb), \hat{a}(\kb')] = 0\,.
\end{equation}
%
The $w$ modes are normalised by the condition \cite{Mukhanov:2005sc}
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:quantcondition-intro}
w^\star(\kvi)w'(\kvi) - {w^{\star}}'(\kvi)w(\kvi) = i\,.
\end{equation}
In the expanding FRW background the choice of vacuum is not straightforward.
Suppose one observer selects a zero particle state as the vacuum. Another
observer accelerating with respect to the first will see particles being
created in this ``vacuum'' state due to the Unruh effect
\cite{Kinney2009, Unruh1976a}. In selecting the vacuum we must choose one of the
many equivalent options.
To do this we consider the far past where $\eta\rightarrow -\infty$. The wavelengths of all the
modes are then much smaller than the Hubble radius and curvature scale. The modes are
therefore assumed to evolve in flat space. This suggests the Minkowski vacuum as the
most natural vacuum state to select and this choice of vacuum at
early times is known as the Bunch-Davies vacuum.
%
In the limit $\eta\rightarrow -\infty$ (or equivalently $k/aH\rightarrow \infty$),
the mode equation
\eqref{eq:weqn-intro} becomes
%
\begin{equation}
w''(\kvi) + k^2 w(\kvi) = 0\,,
\end{equation}
%
which has the plane wave solution
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:subhsoln-intro}
w(\kvi) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2k}} e^{-ik\eta}\,.
\end{equation}
%
This is the initial condition for modes which are well inside the horizon.
Now consider the de Sitter limit in which $\varepsilon_H\rightarrow 0$ and $H$
is constant. We have $z''/z = a''/a = 2/\eta^2$ so the mode equation is \cite{Baumann2009}
%
\begin{equation}
w''(\kvi) + \left[ k^2 -\frac{2}{\eta^2} \right]w(\kvi) = 0\,.
\end{equation}
%
A full general solution for $w$ is
%
\begin{equation}
w(\kvi) = A\frac{e^{-ik\eta}}{\sqrt{2k}}\left(1 -\frac{i}{k\eta}\right)
+B\frac{e^{+ik\eta}}{\sqrt{2k}}\left(1 +\frac{i}{k\eta}\right)\,.
\end{equation}
%
Taking the condition \eqref{eq:quantcondition-intro} along with the solution
for subhorizon modes in \eq{eq:subhsoln-intro} we find that $A=1$ and $B=0$.
Thus the full solution in de Sitter space is \cite{book:liddle}
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:wfinal-intro}
w(\kvi) = \frac{e^{-ik\eta}}{\sqrt{2k}}\left(1 -\frac{i}{k\eta}\right)\,.
\end{equation}
%
Inflation in spacetimes that are close to de Sitter will contain perturbations
with a spectrum defined by \eq{eq:wfinal-intro}. The slow roll approximation is
enough to ensure that inflation occurs in a quasi-de Sitter spacetime.
However, the initial conditions for Fourier modes in \eq{eq:subhsoln-intro}
apply to non slow roll models so long as they are applied well before horizon
crossing.
\subsection{Power Spectra and Spectral Indices}
The power spectrum of the inflaton perturbation $\dvp1 = u/a$ can now be
defined as
%
\begin{equation}
\langle \dvp1(\textbf{k}_1) \dvp1(\textbf{k}_2) \rangle
\equiv (2\pi)^3 \delta(\textbf{k}_1 + \textbf{k}_2) P_{\dvp{}}^2 (k_1)
= (2\pi)^3 \delta(\textbf{k}_1 + \textbf{k}_2) \frac{|w(\kb_1)|^2}{a^2}\,,
\end{equation}
%
where $\langle \ldots \rangle$ denotes the ensemble average.
If taken over a large enough volume, the ensemble average and spatial average
are equivalent \cite{book:lyth}.
The power spectrum
$P_{\dvp{}}^2$ depends only on the magnitude of the wavenumber
vector, $k=|\bf{k}|$, but has dimensions of $k^{-3}$. A dimensionless power
spectrum
can be defined as
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:curlPrdefn-intro}
\mathcal{P}_{\dvp{}}^2= \Delta^2_{\dvp{}} \equiv \frac{k^3}{2\pi^2}
P_{\dvp{}}^2(k)\,.
\end{equation}
%
In a similar way we can define the power spectrum of the comoving curvature
perturbation $\R = H\dvp1/\dot{\vp}_0$:
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:Prdefn-intro}
\langle \R(\textbf{k}_1) \R(\textbf{k}_2) \rangle
= (2\pi)^3 \delta(\textbf{k}_1 + \textbf{k}_2) P_\R^2 (k_1)\,,
\end{equation}
%
and the dimensionless power spectrum
%
\begin{equation}
\Pr= \Delta^2_{\dvp{}} \equiv \frac{k^3}{2\pi^2}
P_{\R}^2(k)\,.
\end{equation}
A slow roll inflation model in a quasi-de Sitter spacetime will have the
Fourier mode solution given in \eq{eq:wfinal-intro}.
After horizon crossing, when $k\ll aH$, this gives $|w|^2 = 1/(2k^3 \eta^2)$ so
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:pphi-intro}
\mathcal{P}_{\dvp{}}^2(k) = \left(\frac{H}{2\pi}\right)^2 \,,
\end{equation}
%
for the scalar perturbation spectrum and
%
\begin{equation}
\Pr(k) = \left(\frac{H}{\dot{\vp_0}}\right)^2 \left(\frac{H}{2\pi}\right)^2\,,
\end{equation}
%
for the comoving curvature perturbation spectrum. Models that are not
slowly rolling usually require their more complicated mode equations to be
numerically solved.
We have discussed in depth the scalar perturbations but tensor perturbations
can also be produced. The tensor perturbation $h_{ij}$
has two polarisations, $h_s$ for $s=+, \times$. The amplitude of
each can be thought of as a separate scalar field. The analysis for each field
is similar to that above with the substitution $h_s= 2\dvp1/\Mpl$. After horizon
crossing in a quasi-de Sitter space the spectrum for each polarisation is
%
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{P}_h^2(k) = \frac{4}{\Mpl^2} \left(\frac{H}{2\pi}\right)^2\,,
\end{equation}
%
and the overall tensor perturbation spectrum is
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:Ptdefn-intro}
\Pt(k) = \frac{2}{\Mpl^2} \frac{H^2}{\pi^2}\,.
\end{equation}
The ratio of the tensor to curvature perturbations (tensor-scalar ratio) $r$ is
defined as
%
\begin{equation}
r = \frac{\Pt}{\Pr}\,,
\end{equation}
%
where $r$ is usually quoted at a particular $k$ but could in principle depend
on $k$. The tensor-scalar ratio can also be written in terms of $\varepsilon_H$:
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:rslowroll-intro}
r = 16 \varepsilon_H\,.
\end{equation}
As $\varepsilon_H\ll1$ for slow roll models of inflation the amplitude of tensor
perturbations that these models produce is much smaller than the amplitude of
curvature perturbations.
% Post spectra derivations
If the curvature perturbation power spectrum, $\Pr(k)$, is independent of
wavenumber $k$, it is said to be scale invariant. The spectral index $n_s$ is a
measure of the deviation from scale invariance:
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:nsdefn-intro}
n_s -1 = \frac{\d \ln (\Pr(k))}{\d \ln k}\,,
\end{equation}
%
where $n_s=1$ denotes a scale invariant spectrum. The spectral index of
the tensor power spectrum can be similarly defined:
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:ntdefn-intro}
n_T = \frac{\d \ln(\Pt(k))}{\d \ln k}\,,
\end{equation}
although this definition means that the spectrum is scale invariant if
$n_T=0$.
The spectral indices and indeed the spectra themselves are usually calculated
at an arbitrary pivot scale. The WMAP results for $\Pr$ and $\Pt$ outlined in
Section~\ref{sec:obs-intro} are quoted at the scale $k=0.002\Mpc^{-1}$.
If there is a non-trivial dependence of $\Pr$ or $\Pt$ on $k$ then higher order
derivatives can be taken to give the running of the quantities. The runnings
of the spectral indices are
%
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:runningsdefn-intro}
\alpha_s = \frac{\d \ln n_s}{\d \ln k}\,, \quad
\alpha_T = \frac{\d \ln n_T}{\d \ln k}\,.
\end{equation}
In the slow roll approximation $n_s$ and $n_T$ can be written in terms of the slow
roll parameters $\epsilon_H$ and $\eta_H$, evaluated at $k=aH$ using $\d \ln(aH)
\simeq H\d t$:
%
\begin{align}
n_s -1 &= -4\epsilon_H + 2\eta_H\,, \\
n_T &= -2\epsilon_H \label{eq:ntslowroll-intro}\,.
\end{align}
%