-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Testing new model pipelining #47
Comments
Dev catchup notes: Can we have a reference implementation that includes a shell script in Also noted that the quickest win to integrating a pytorch model is to use the dataloader directly (no harm in getting it via Then the reference implementation replaces that within |
Updated tasklist above, with following being reference library implementation with pytorch backend: https://github.com/icenet-ai/icenet-gan Integration with the icenet-pipeline is enabled by updating the predict and train yaml templates to point to new script files under the template directory, which runs the above library's |
Look towards developing a demo notebook for a PyTorch (or another framework, e.g. JAX) implementation to illustrate flexibility of the pipeline.
icenet
librarytrain.py
andpredict.py
in themodels/
part of the library use IceNetDataSet as an interface to tfrecorddatasets or an underlying dataloader: these are built around the tensorflow pipeline so could be rearchitectured down the line.train
/predict
functionality for backend ML providerPyTorch experimentation is a really good idea for flexing, other options like JAX are nice to haves but not urgent (pytorch is the best test as many people already want to use it)
It occurs to me that the pipeline interface in the long run should be able to largely detach from implementation specifics (other than in the templates for ensembling / CLI usage or ENVS setup)
A big job but definitely doable. Reach out as and when you need to @rchan26
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: