Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

COS role should use a targeted variable for IBM Cloud API Key #1346

Closed
durera opened this issue Jun 26, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1555
Closed

COS role should use a targeted variable for IBM Cloud API Key #1346

durera opened this issue Jun 26, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1555
Assignees
Labels
Critical - Tracked in Jira Issues that have been escalated internally and are tracked in Jira now Improvement/Tweak Small improvement or tweak to existing capability Quick Fix
Milestone

Comments

@durera
Copy link
Contributor

durera commented Jun 26, 2024

The COS role uses IBMCOS_RESOURCEGROUP to allow COS specific setting of the group, but does not do the same for the API Key, this means that we are forced to use an over-priviledged API key for the COS integration ... it should work the same way:

  • cos_apikey
  • cos_resourcegroup

The MAS tekton piptlines and CLI will need matching updates too.

@JonahLuckett JonahLuckett self-assigned this Jul 23, 2024
@JonahLuckett JonahLuckett added the Improvement/Tweak Small improvement or tweak to existing capability label Jul 23, 2024
@harsh42774 harsh42774 self-assigned this Sep 17, 2024
@durera durera added the Critical - Tracked in Jira Issues that have been escalated internally and are tracked in Jira now label Nov 1, 2024
@durera
Copy link
Contributor Author

durera commented Nov 1, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Critical - Tracked in Jira Issues that have been escalated internally and are tracked in Jira now Improvement/Tweak Small improvement or tweak to existing capability Quick Fix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants