-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 352
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support utf-8 in structs, functions and similar just as go does #169
Comments
newm4n
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 15, 2021
* added index for viewdoc * pushing first viewdoc * Added more formating for viewdoc * Added goornogo coverage test pipeline * Lowering minimum coverage by 0.1 % to pass on travis * change circle-ci to use goornogo * Merge from upstream * Now simple names is using Unicodes, hopefuly it covers most user's common letters * Added example to prove that function name, variable names are now accepting unicode in their identifier. * A little more test to check rule name and retraction can accept unicode.
New patch released for this... |
I can confirm it's working beautifully, thank you!!!! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We have some strict language requirements within some of the public sector, where "business" expect to do their work in Swedish (with the crazy character å, ä and even ö).
It is fine to use those characters and other as variable names in go, but we generally avoid that since we define it as IT-specific woke.
However, a rule is something share by IT and busiess, where it really would make sense to be able to use non-ascii characters in structs and functions. Even better if we could translare the few keywords in a rule to Swedish as well (but that is minor).
Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Allow all runes in rules that are allowed in golang variable name.
(if easy, allow translation of the keywords in a rule as well).
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: